April 4, 200917 yr He didn't say that the US is bad. Then what was he apologizing for? By my definition if you apologize for something you are admitting that you have done something wrong or in simpler terms were bad.
April 4, 200917 yr Then what was he apologizing for? By my definition if you apologize for something you are admitting that you have done something wrong or in simpler terms were bad. Are you saying our leadership has never been arrogant or dismissive of Europe?
April 4, 200917 yr Then what was he apologizing for? By my definition if you apologize for something you are admitting that you have done something wrong or in simpler terms were bad. He said that the US has faults - arrogance and dismissiveness. "Bad" is too simplistic. Things aren't either bad or good...there is a whole spectrum in between. Admitting a fault doesn't equate with "bad" in a mature world.
April 4, 200917 yr He said that the US has faults - arrogance and dismissiveness. "Bad" is too simplistic. Things aren't either bad or good...there is a whole spectrum in between. Admitting a fault doesn't equate with "bad" in a mature world. That place is hard to find in a country with a group of peope looking to undermine its leader at every turn. It is much easier to slam the POTUS than it is to simply look at his words to see if there is any truth to them. If I can't do a little self reflection and admit my shortcomings TO THOSE WHO HAVE FACED THE BRUNT OF THEM then I am stuck still being an adolescent.
April 5, 200917 yr That place is hard to find in a country with a group of peope looking to undermine its leader at every turn. It is much easier to slam the POTUS than it is to simply look at his words to see if there is any truth to them.This has been true in every administration since Washington's.
April 5, 200917 yr Author Still waiting on examples of how we are arrogant towards Europe.. Or are we just because O says we are ?? Anyone??
April 5, 200917 yr Still waiting on examples of how we are arrogant towards Europe.. Or are we just because O says we are ?? Anyone?? This country has a history of expecting other countries to use the UN to but we don't have to. It seems that this country only uses the UN when it is in its suits its own interests. The US champions human rights but it has a distant and recent history of human rights violations itself. The US was against Russia invading Georgia but we had invaded Iraq on false pretenses. Other countries around the world wants something done about global warming but in this country there are some who say it is a figment of people's imagination.
April 5, 200917 yr Author The UN has been proven a corrupt organization and what does Iraq have to do with our "arrogance" toward Europe?? Check the air pollution standards in Europe.. They are a lot worse than the USA.. Why dosen't Europe carp about China's pollution which is the worlds worst?
April 5, 200917 yr This country has a history of expecting other countries to use the UN to but we don't have to. It seems that this country only uses the UN when it is in its suits its own interests. The US champions human rights but it has a distant and recent history of human rights violations itself. The US was against Russia invading Georgia but we had invaded Iraq on false pretenses. Other countries around the world wants something done about global warming but in this country there are some who say it is a figment of people's imagination. False pretenses that Saddam admitted he set up. In his mind, he did it to scare Iran into not invading. He just never counted on someone having the "arrogance" of calling his bluff and 10-12 years of ignoring the UN guidelines for him.
April 5, 200917 yr Then when you need them to help you what do you do? It looks as if we were able to do the job in Iraq withou them. I have not confirmed it with a second source, but I read that Iraq has met 17 of the 18 benchmarks set back during Bush's adminstration. Could someone confirm if that is true or not? The help in Afganistan has been very little. While it would be great if the Western Europeans would help, we have gotten by without them. I have not read all the threads, but I have seen no mention of anything they have led on, but whining. They did little to nothing in the Balkans until the US became involved. They had a great chance to lead with US aid, but did nothing in their own backyard.
April 5, 200917 yr It looks as if we were able to do the job in Iraq withou them. I have not confirmed it with a second source, but I read that Iraq has met 17 of the 18 benchmarks set back during Bush's adminstration. Could someone confirm if that is true or not? The help in Afganistan has been very little. While it would be great if the Western Europeans would help, we have gotten by without them. I have not read all the threads, but I have seen no mention of anything they have led on, but whining. They did little to nothing in the Balkans until the US became involved. They had a great chance to lead with US aid, but did nothing in their own backyard. Fries and toast?
April 5, 200917 yr This country has a history of expecting other countries to use the UN to but we don't have to. It seems that this country only uses the UN when it is in its suits its own interests. The US champions human rights but it has a distant and recent history of human rights violations itself. The US was against Russia invading Georgia but we had invaded Iraq on false pretenses. Other countries around the world wants something done about global warming but in this country there are some who say it is a figment of people's imagination. What were all those UN Resolutions that Iraq was to meet? Iraq ignored them as Iraq beleived the UN would do nothing. The UN passed one last resolution for Iraq to live up to or face possible military action, they failed to live up to that resolution. Bush then sent troops in, based on a resolution passed by Congress, which most Democracts supported. The US had about 40 nations supporting us, most of which were not involved in combat, but support. Of course the French were no where to be seen or the Germans or the Russians as they did not want to ruin their business connections. Much of what they were doing was against UN sanctions.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.