I don't know, a CovCath fan posted it.

 

It would be a mistake for any candidate to come into an interview thinking that past perceived wrongs somehow now make them entitled to the job and a mea culpa.

Nate Roedig in my opinion would be a great fit for CCH. I mean he played there and he knows how everything works over in Park Hills.

 

To tack onto your post, Nate has been back and coached at CovCath since graduating and Coach Wolfe has not. Does that make a difference?

To tack onto your post, Nate has been back and coached at CovCath since graduating and Coach Wolfe has not. Does that make a difference?

 

No.

Just because someone played at CovCath does not make him the right person for the job.

Right now I believe Wolfe is the frontrunner,but Wirth could be a surprise because he is a existing head coach

It would be a mistake for any candidate to come into an interview thinking that past perceived wrongs somehow now make them entitled to the job and a mea culpa.

 

I agree completely. The way I read the other post was that something happened in the past that may have left Mike upset to the point that he wouldn't interview. I don't know either way. From what I know of Coach Wolfe, if he were to interview, any bad feelings (if there are any) would be handled professionally and honestly.

What about Coach Wagner at NCC? He's GOT to be tired of waiting for Bob to move on.

You would definitely be surprised! Have you ever been to anything at Holmes with football? You have to have a base that is strong before you can build anything on it. The base that is being established, off the field and in the classroom will translate over to the field starting this year! This isnt a very educated comment.:irked:

 

If Coach Lickert chose to apply for the Cov Cath job, I think the powers that be would be very impressed from the interview if was granted!

 

 

Closer than you know. First off look at how the football field looks now compared to how it looked before he got there. Secondly, the base you are talking about was being built when he arrived. If you do not believe that look at what the previous coach is doing at Conner.

 

Also, I think he applied last time the job was open.

Closer than you know. First off look at how the football field looks now compared to how it looked before he got there.

 

What does the field have to do with Lickert? It was maintained by Dave Hartman who had that thing shining. He's no longer doing it. That's the issue.

 

Secondly, the base you are talking about was being built when he arrived. If you do not believe that look at what the previous coach is doing at Conner.

 

.

 

You should be successful at Conner with this JR class.

Does anyone the type of offense Woolf and Siple run?

Does anyone the type of offense Woolf and Siple run?

 

How would we know what type of offense Woolf runs since he's always been a coach of the defense?

How would we know what type of offense Woolf runs since he's always been a coach of the defense?

 

I'm sure Wolfe is flexible enough to go with an offense that best suits the talent available.

My bad Clyde, just a curious question. Colonel fan what do you think he might run, based off this coming year players?

Does anyone the type of offense Woolf and Siple run?

 

Siple runs a spread offense and he borrows a few plays from the Highlands playbook.

 

I know Mike was interested in Cooper at one point as well but it didn't work with the AD. Mike would be a great head coach.. CCH needs to snatch him up.

I'm sure Wolfe is flexible enough to go with an offense that best suits the talent available.

 

My guess is that a new head coach's offense will be based on who he associates himself with as a coach now. So, for example, Woolf coaches with Nate Roedig who is the OC for Ryle. Ryle has just started to implement a spread-based offense. So, would Woolf bring along Nate and the spread?

My bad Clyde, just a curious question. Colonel fan what do you think he might run, based off this coming year players?

 

Sometimes the written word doesn't come out like it was intended. I apologize for that. It truly was a question.