December 5, 200718 yr I find it interesting how, before last season, Bailey was deemed untouchable. Now, it seems, he's mentioned in every possible trade combination. Along with that, no Reds fans seem to be the least bit concerned about that, whereas before he was considered by many of those same fans to be "The Savior Of The Franchise." For what it's worth, I've never really taken a hard line one way or another with Bailey. But I have to ask: Why is he suddenly expendable? And not just by the organization, but why do you Reds fans who stopped just short of renaming him Texas Jesus now have no problem with him being dangled? Has his value dropped off the map that much because of suspect performance in his '07 MLB stint? Do you feel he is not what he's been made out to be? Has he been given the chance he needs to succeed? I just find it all very puzzling.
December 5, 200718 yr I don't think they are seriously entertaining trading Bailey. He's a young arm with tons of talent.
December 5, 200718 yr I find it interesting how, before last season, Bailey was deemed untouchable. Now, it seems, he's mentioned in every possible trade combination. Along with that, no Reds fans seem to be the least bit concerned about that, whereas before he was considered by many of those same fans to be "The Savior Of The Franchise." For what it's worth, I've never really taken a hard line one way or another with Bailey. But I have to ask: Why is he suddenly expendable? And not just by the organization, but why do you Reds fans who stopped just short of renaming him Texas Jesus now have no problem with him being dangled? Has his value dropped off the map that much because of suspect performance in his '07 MLB stint? Do you feel he is not what he's been made out to be? Has he been given the chance he needs to succeed? I just find it all very puzzling. You need to ask HSSB. He has some great info on Homer Bailey.
December 5, 200718 yr IMO, he was brought up too early and only to sell tickets. I said all along that that decision could take a toll on him mentally. Not sure if that's it or if the Reds organization knows more about his physical problems than they're leading everyone to believe. For me, it's on the organization as much as it is Homer. I still don't think Krivsky wanted him up yet... I think a lot of Reds fans thought he'd be more dominant than he was. 98 mph straight fastballs without the threat of a change are easy for those guys to hit, unlike the minors...
December 5, 200718 yr I don't think they are seriously entertaining trading Bailey. He's a young arm with tons of talent. And why would you think that?
December 5, 200718 yr IMO, he was brought up too early and only to sell tickets. I said all along that that decision could take a toll on him mentally. Not sure if that's it or if the Reds organization knows more about his physical problems than they're leading everyone to believe. For me, it's on the organization as much as it is Homer. I still don't think Krivsky wanted him up yet... I think a lot of Reds fans thought he'd be more dominant than he was. 98 mph straight fastballs without the threat of a change are easy for those guys to hit, unlike the minors... He never hit 98 when he was up here is the other problem. If he did maybe 1 time.
December 5, 200718 yr He never hit 98 when he was up here is the other problem. If he did maybe 1 time. Even worse...
December 5, 200718 yr And why would you think that? It's just my opinion, thats all. I agree that he was brought up to sell tickets and shame on the Reds for that. I do think he is going to be quality SP for years to come.
December 5, 200718 yr Author So, because of a less-than-dazzling nine appearances in the bigs, and him only hitting 98mph, you guys think we've been sold a bill of goods on what was touted as "the future," and you guys are content to give up on him? I'm still confused …
December 5, 200718 yr Personally I think it's a mistake to trade him. However, if I were pulling the strings, I'd have to consider him in a package with Hamilton if we could get a top flite starter, especially considering the competition in our division. I, for one, hope he stays,,,,unless,,,,,
December 5, 200718 yr So, because of a less-than-dazzling nine appearances in the bigs, and him only hitting 98mph, you guys think we've been sold a bill of goods on what was touted as "the future," and you guys are content to give up on him? I'm still confused … Bottom line, he's a mental midget. At this point, if he doesn't have the mental makeup to be a big league pitcher he probably won't ever have it. Personally, I think we have enough roller-coaster rides...
December 5, 200718 yr He's a thrower with a LONG way to go before he's a pitcher. His 2nd and 3rd pitches are way below where they need to be, and there is little to no movement on his heater. If the price is right, make the deal...
December 5, 200718 yr He's a thrower with a LONG way to go before he's a pitcher. His 2nd and 3rd pitches are way below where they need to be, and there is little to no movement on his heater. If the price is right, make the deal... Can't disagree with that. How big was his signing bonus?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.