October 29, 200718 yr I'm well aware of the situation as outlined in my last post. What was your argument again? Sorry, it seemed you needed a brush up on the past. My argument is he's a cheater for stealing signals from other teams. It's not complicated.
October 29, 200718 yr I know if I played for the Skins I'd be in the gutter. I think I'd have to forfeit my paycheck after playing in that one.
October 29, 200718 yr I'd say the Colt and Patriot offenses are comparable, but the New England Defense is better. Pats win by 10.
October 29, 200718 yr This was impressive. THought the Redskins had an outside chance of making this game tight and if the Patriots stumbled, upset them. I was never more wrong. WOW!
October 29, 200718 yr Sorry, it seemed you needed a brush up on the past. My argument is he's a cheater for stealing signals from other teams. It's not complicated. You know all SPORTS teams do that. You know all HS sports teams do that. His crime was not stealing the signals but simply videotaping it. Having a guy standing up there trying to figure out what they are doing, I believe, is pretty common practice. Videotaping it is not. As a basketball coach, I listen for what play the coach calls and diagram the play as they run it. WHen we prepare for that team, my players will know the play and what they are going to try and do. Would you call me a cheater?
October 29, 200718 yr You know all SPORTS teams do that. You know all HS sports teams do that. His crime was not stealing the signals but simply videotaping it. Having a guy standing up there trying to figure out what they are doing, I believe, is pretty common practice. Videotaping it is not. As a basketball coach, I listen for what play the coach calls and diagram the play as they run it. WHen we prepare for that team, my players will know the play and what they are going to try and do. Would you call me a cheater? I call that "scouting" others call that "cheating." :lol:
October 29, 200718 yr I call that "scouting" others call that "cheating." :lol: Obviously the NFL thought was he was doing was cheating right?
October 29, 200718 yr Obviously the NFL thought was he was doing was cheating right? THe difference is he videotaped it.
October 29, 200718 yr THe difference is he videotaped it. Considering the penalties enforced, sounds like a VERY big difference.
October 29, 200718 yr No it is crap because there is something called Karma and in a sport like the NFL where you can go from good to bad very easy. These people won't forget it when you are down and they are going to hand it to you like that. And why in the WORLD was Brady in anyways. For all the people spouting about Karma...have you forgotten that the Patriots were the laughing stock of the NFL for quite some time...maybe what we're seeing is Karma...it just happens that the Patriots are paying people back for their past. I'm already tired of this whining about New England running the score up and I'm gonna have to hear it for another two months...basically what you're saying is that New England is too good. Again, what does everyone expect...Belichick to start kneeling the ball when the 4th quarter starts. If he kicks a FG in that spot is he running the score up...he gave the Redskins a chance to stop them on 4th down and hold them scoreless. It's not the Pats problem that no one can stop them... ...well, actually it is...
October 29, 200718 yr If you don't want them to score, stop them. Score until they stop you, don't stop yourself..
October 29, 200718 yr I love it. Going for it on 4th while they're up by 38. :thumb: I don't just want Brady to break Manning's TD record, I want him to shatter it. If the Redskins didn't want them running up the score they should have done something about it. The biggest mistake the NFL ever made was making Darth Hoodie mad....Now the whole league is going to pay.:fire:
October 29, 200718 yr No Gibbs walked on past him, it was topic of conversation on the NFL Network. They showed video evidence later on in the show of them shaking hands.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.