August 21, 200719 yr I hate when people take up for someone who is obviously guilty. If he's taking a plea bargain...he's guilty. Why take up for him and make excuses? Ask Bud Selig (sp)?
August 21, 200719 yr Goodell has shown that he isn't playing around thus far. I think he has done an outsanding job since he's been in. Vick might go down as the biggest waste of talent in sports history if he doesn't make it back. In the past his teammates and coaches have seemed to all love him. That's usually how I decide what guys are like behind closed doors. I'm not really suprised that he was in on it and it's too bad he made the bad decisions he did. I also think there is a lot of worse things that have gone on in the NFL that we don't know about that would make this case look like Candyland. You give that many guys that have never had anything in their life as much money as these guys are getting at a young age and it's a recipie for disaster a lot of times. WOW!
August 21, 200719 yr If the Feds are involved I am sure that you can next look at the IRS getting involved. Seems to me they may have reason to consider possible tax evasion charges if any gambling earnings went unreported. :thumb: Tax evasion and Racketeering but part of the plea deal may have been that they wouldn't pursue those charges if he plead guilty to te others.
August 21, 200719 yr If the Feds are involved I am sure that you can next look at the IRS getting involved. Seems to me they may have reason to consider possible tax evasion charges if any gambling earnings went unreported. Yep! That wouldn't suprise me.
August 21, 200719 yr I heard an attorney say that this was not a "plea" but rather a "surrender" as the govt had all of the evidence they needed with the other plea deals. He said that would factor into the sentencing. Apparently, its quite common for those convicted in Federal court to serve less time than what they actually receive.
August 21, 200719 yr Who is worse? Vick? Nate Newton? Convicted of having large amounts of drugs in his possession. Pacman? Many violations . Odell? I'd probably rate them as: Nate, Pacman, Vick, Odell.
August 21, 200719 yr Vick pleas guilty, gets jail time and suspension. Which is deserved. Giambi admits using steriods, thus cheating in baseball and gets nothing. Bonds gets blasted for steroid usage, even though he's never tested positive. Is this the right message to be sending to our kids?
August 21, 200719 yr Who is worse? Vick? Nate Newton? Convicted of having large amounts of drugs in his possession. Pacman? Many violations . Odell? I'd probably rate them as: Nate, Pacman, Vick, Odell. I would put Vick at the top of this list.
August 21, 200719 yr How does the two compare. One was on the court and the other during his personal time away from football. How will that cause a ? mark for football? How do you know it was away from football? What if he owed someone something and thought the easy way out, instead of paying them he'd throw a game? No matter what your opinion is, a player running a gambling ring is bad for business.
August 21, 200719 yr Vick is done as a QB and better hope he has a great financial guy who invested the millions and millions of dollars he has made. He threw away about $50,000,000 this year in salary and endorsements.
August 21, 200719 yr Vick is done as a QB and better hope he has a great financial guy who invested the millions and millions of dollars he has made. He threw away about $50,000,000 this year in salary and endorsements. I was curious how much he "lost". I knew some sponsors dropped him, but I wasn't sure of the total dollar amount.
August 21, 200719 yr I would put Vick at the top of this list. Really? Over a guy who had so much cocaine that it had to be for resale purposes over a guy who was cruel and inhumane to animals?
August 22, 200719 yr Really? Over a guy who had so much cocaine that it had to be for resale purposes over a guy who was cruel and inhumane to animals? It really doesn't take much as far as quantity for a prosecutor to be able to charge someone with posession w/ intent to distibute.
August 22, 200719 yr Who is worse? Vick? Nate Newton? Convicted of having large amounts of drugs in his possession. Pacman? Many violations . Odell? I'd probably rate them as: Nate, Pacman, Vick, Odell. I don't know how you pick one as worse.
August 22, 200719 yr It really doesn't take much as far as quantity for a prosecutor to be able to charge someone with posession w/ intent to distibute. Thank you, Mr. Mason. Let me make one correction. It was marijuana. 100 pounds. Nate's a big boy but there's no way in heck he had that for himself. He was going to be a seller. How can that not be above a guy who hurt/killed animals?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.