And the period.

:walk: :walk: :walk:

Can I get all of you to head over to GD and chime in on the Pecan v. Cashew debate? I like them both but I need definitive proof of which is better.

 

Thanks.

Can I get all of you to head over to GD and chime in on the Pecan v. Cashew debate? I like them both but I need definitive proof of which is better.

 

Thanks.

 

:lol:

Can I get all of you to head over to GD and chime in on the Pecan v. Cashew debate? I like them both but I need definitive proof of which is better.

 

Thanks.

Only if you chime in on the debate between the first Star Wars trilogy and the prequel trilogy.

 

There are plenty of statistical arguments for the prequel trilogy. It grossed more, the resolution of the film was better, it played against tougher films, etc.

 

But anyone who's seen them both and knows anything about filmaking knows the the first trilogy is, was, and always will be superior.

Woodson plays every game against some very good defenses. Brohm hasn't played a full season since he has started for louisville. Brohm is more impressive. HE makes better decisions. Woodson is the guy that I think could get the job done.

You're right, those juggernaut defenses of Louisiana Monroe...C. Michigan (one of them)....Vandy, MSU, etc...they are awesome...no seriously they are.

You're right, those juggernaut defenses of Louisiana Monroe...C. Michigan (one of them)....Vandy, MSU, etc...they are awesome...no seriously they are.

 

Umm.. wasn't Vandy's one of the top rated passing defenses coming into the UK game?

 

And he put up 42, 45, 38, and 34 points on those teams.

Umm.. wasn't Vandy's one of the top rated passing defenses coming into the UK game?

 

And he put up 42, 45, 38, and 34 points on those teams.

Wow, those numbers aren't divisible by 6. He's kicking, too?

 

Oh, you're just going with offense produced while he's running the show. Well, in that case, I'd

 

 

REALLY

 

 

love to compare statistics between Brohm and Woodson.

Brohm is a god.

 

Woodson is a mere mortal.

You're right, those juggernaut defenses of Louisiana Monroe...C. Michigan (one of them)....Vandy, MSU, etc...they are awesome...no seriously they are.

 

 

Or was it those juggernaut defenses of Kentucky, Temple, Middle Tn, Syracuse...Those are awesome too...seriously, they are....

Wow, those numbers aren't divisible by 6. He's kicking, too?

 

Oh, you're just going with offense produced while he's running the show. Well, in that case, I'd

 

 

REALLY

 

 

love to compare statistics between Brohm and Woodson.

 

 

Get caught on calling Vandy's D bad so you switch your argument. Classic.

Get caught on calling Vandy's D bad so you switch your argument. Classic.

Getting caught calling out the wrong poster? Classic. RP is who you're looking for.:thumb:

Brohm is a god.

 

Woodson is a mere mortal.

:lol:

Getting caught calling out the wrong poster? Classic. RP is who you're looking for.:thumb:

 

Wait.. you two aren't the same person? Coulda fooled me

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

yup.. my bad. all apologies, but the point is still valid.

Wait.. you two aren't the same person? Coulda fooled me

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

yup.. my bad. all apologies, but the point is still valid.

I can't help it that you brought up total offensive production as a point in Woodson's favor. I certainly can't help that I'd love to compare those stats. And I'm assuredly not to blame if you suddenly aren't interested in going that route anymore.

 

By the way, RP is a Trinity fan, a Notre Dame fan, a Duke fan and loves the Mets. He's also a Republican. The only reason he likes Louisville is because of Brohm, and the only reason we agree a lot is that we both like being right.

Get caught on calling Vandy's D bad so you switch your argument. Classic.

Maybe that was tied to the 156 yards a game they allowed on the ground. And before you bring up the 88 yards allowed against Florida, I'll just mention the 253 they let DUKE ring up...