November 29, 200619 yr To stop this segment of the argument, both players have gone up against more than their fair share of some pitiful defenses this year, and both player's stats have benefited... next topic.
November 29, 200619 yr To stop this segment of the argument, both players have gone up against more than their fair share of some pitiful defenses this year, and both player's stats have benefited... next topic. :irked: I was just getting started...
November 29, 200619 yr :irked: I was just getting started... Fair enough... Vandy/Miss. St > Kentucky/Temple While we are at it, Woodson has bigger biceps than Brohm... that should make his draft status higher than Brohm.
November 29, 200619 yr Author Fair enough... Vandy/Miss. St > Kentucky/Temple While we are at it, Woodson has bigger biceps than Brohm... that should make his draft status higher than Brohm. Bigger shoe size as well...
November 29, 200619 yr Maybe that was tied to the 156 yards a game they allowed on the ground. And before you bring up the 88 yards allowed against Florida, I'll just mention the 253 they let DUKE ring up... No.. I'm pretty sure it was brought up that Vandy's PASS D was rated highly. I'm just remembering that from another post here, so no link.
November 29, 200619 yr No.. I'm pretty sure it was brought up that Vandy's PASS D was rated highly. I'm just remembering that from another post here, so no link. Maybe you missed the obvious point I made. The Vandy pass D looked good because teams were running all over them. Clear???
November 29, 200619 yr Or was it those juggernaut defenses of Kentucky, Temple, Middle Tn, Syracuse...Those are awesome too...seriously, they are.... Brohm didn't really explode on any of those....but did on.... Miami...WVU...Cincy...Pitt.
November 29, 200619 yr By the way, RP is a Trinity fan, a Notre Dame fan, a Duke fan and loves the Mets. He's also a Republican. The only reason he likes Louisville is because of Brohm, and the only reason we agree a lot is that we both like being right. I've been pegged..... :scared: What's funny is how the three of us mesh so darned well.
November 29, 200619 yr Brohm didn't really explode on any of those....but did on.... Miami...WVU...Cincy...Pitt. Be fair now, if you want to talk about exploding, he only did that against Pitt. That was his only multiple touchdown game of the year. He has been solid but far from spectacular the rest of the year. His performance has only been okay this year. Whether due to injury, a running game or whatever he was only the 4th rated Junior Quarterback on Mel Kiper's latest draft list. Maybe it is because of injury but he's got something to prove before he's a first round pick. Right now he's ranked better than Woodson and I'd have to think that he'll end up the better draft pick. However, he does have to produce a little more like against Pitt if he wants to do that--the NFL doesn't draft quarterbacks according to their ability to check off and call audibles. Otherwise the league would be full of Ivy League signal callers.
November 29, 200619 yr --the NFL doesn't draft quarterbacks according to their ability to check off and call audibles. Otherwise the league would be full of Ivy League signal callers. best post yet :ylsuper:
November 29, 200619 yr Be fair now, if you want to talk about exploding, he only did that against Pitt. That was his only multiple touchdown game of the year. He has been solid but far from spectacular the rest of the year. His performance has only been okay this year. Whether due to injury, a running game or whatever he was only the 4th rated Junior Quarterback on Mel Kiper's latest draft list. Maybe it is because of injury but he's got something to prove before he's a first round pick. Right now he's ranked better than Woodson and I'd have to think that he'll end up the better draft pick. However, he does have to produce a little more like against Pitt if he wants to do that--the NFL doesn't draft quarterbacks according to their ability to check off and call audibles. Otherwise the league would be full of Ivy League signal callers. That is true. However, the best quarterbacks in the league are drop back passers that can read the defense and change calls. I Believe that Brohm will be a sucessful NFL quarterback. I do not believe the same about Woodson. I also know that I would have much rather had Brohm wearing blue than Woodson. I like Woodson, but come on. Ball delivery, accuracy, read capability...
November 29, 200619 yr Maybe you missed the obvious point I made. The Vandy pass D looked good because teams were running all over them. Clear??? Or maybe teams had to run because the pass defense was so good?? :sssh:
November 29, 200619 yr Be fair now, if you want to talk about exploding, he only did that against Pitt. That was his only multiple touchdown game of the year. He has been solid but far from spectacular the rest of the year. His performance has only been okay this year. Whether due to injury, a running game or whatever he was only the 4th rated Junior Quarterback on Mel Kiper's latest draft list. Maybe it is because of injury but he's got something to prove before he's a first round pick. Right now he's ranked better than Woodson and I'd have to think that he'll end up the better draft pick. However, he does have to produce a little more like against Pitt if he wants to do that--the NFL doesn't draft quarterbacks according to their ability to check off and call audibles. Otherwise the league would be full of Ivy League signal callers. He was 10/14 for 180 with a TD, for a half against Miami Through for well over 300 in the other 3 games....
November 29, 200619 yr The NFL doesn't draft quarterbacks according to their ability to check off and call audibles. Otherwise the league would be full of Ivy League signal callers. Right...but you mix that with his brilliant touch, and ability to thread a needle...and suddenly he is looking draftable.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.