Jim Schue Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Why Oh Why do teams in college almost never use this? Louisville could have conceivably gone into the half down 4 or maybe even 2 with good clock management. Instead they shoot a 3 they could have taken 15 seconds earlier, then foul on the other end so they still go in down 7. I just don't understand why something so basic — getting an extra possession — is not used more sensibly by college coaches. Just dumb. :ohbrother: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Schue Posted February 11, 2017 Author Share Posted February 11, 2017 Do they do this more often in women's college hoops since they went to 4 quarters? I almost feel like the men's game going 4 quarters would force coaches kicking and screaming into finally using this basic principle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumper_Dad Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 NBA would have gotten 3 or 4 possessions in that time, I agree you rarely see the 2 for 1 at the end of the half in men's basketball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getslow Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 I think the concern coaches have is that shooting is so much worse in the college game, and points so much tougher to come by, that it's more important to get a good shot -- no matter how long it takes -- than it is to get an extra possession. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Schue Posted February 11, 2017 Author Share Posted February 11, 2017 I think the concern coaches have is that shooting is so much worse in the college game, and points so much tougher to come by, that it's more important to get a good shot -- no matter how long it takes -- than it is to get an extra possession. I know, but in that hasty analogy, said coaches discount the fact that if you go into the 2-for-1 situation knowing you're going to do it, your rebounders should be ready for stickbacks. Success there leads the opponent into rushing a shot, likely a bad one, and you still get plenty of time on the back end of the 2-fer to get a good shot to finish the half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggclfan Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 I know, but in that hasty analogy, said coaches discount the fact that if you go into the 2-for-1 situation knowing you're going to do it, your rebounders should be ready for stickbacks. Success there leads the opponent into rushing a shot, likely a bad one, and you still get plenty of time on the back end of the 2-fer to get a good shot to finish the half. I'm with you Schue...drives me crazy when teams do not go 2 fer 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts