jericho Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 Hillary won't be indicted, she knows too much dirt on everyone. Only way she won't be Pres is if someone high up has her killed to shut her big mouth from telling the dirt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumper_Dad Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 Hillary won't be indicted, she knows too much dirt on everyone. Only way she won't be Pres is if someone high up has her killed to shut her big mouth from telling the dirt. I'm thinking more and more she may actually face something out of this. Anything she can hold over anyone's head can be trumped by Bills flying to pedophile island. Bill Clinton's FBI Head Working to Squash Jeffrey Epstein Narrative She may have to use what ever she has, to protect Bill's legacy and their family name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDEaston Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 It's my understanding that an indictment has been filed for review by the attorney general. ...The FBI is searching through a pile of deleted hard drives found in Hillary's closet in an attempt to locate said indictment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twotoplace Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 It's my understanding that an indictment has been filed for review by the attorney general. You got a source for this "understanding" or are you just quoting scuttlebutt you picked up at the Ashland McDonald's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDEaston Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 You got a source for this "understanding" or are you just quoting scuttlebutt you picked up at the Ashland McDonald's? :ohbrother: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FarBeyondDriven Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 You got a source for this "understanding" or are you just quoting scuttlebutt you picked up at the Ashland McDonald's? DUUUUHHHH!!!!! Which way do he go, George, which way did he go? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cammando Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 New evidence: https://www.yahoo.com/news/apnewsbreak-govt-finds-top-secret-clinton-emails-194823520.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Science Friction Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 You got a source for this "understanding" or are you just quoting scuttlebutt you picked up at the Ashland McDonald's? Hardee's is usually another common source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasRanger Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Throw out all the broken laws. Forget them. Common sense had to tell someone in her IT camp this is not cool. 22 "top secret" emails. The highest classification in the government. You can't fix stupid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellcats Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 "The documents are being upgraded at the request of the intelligence community because they contain a category of top secret information," State Department spokesman John Kirby told the AP, calling the withholding of documents in full "not unusual." That means they won't be published online with others being released, even with blacked-out boxes." These emails are being upgraded, so this article is not really the smoking gun some of you hoped it would be. If anything it proves what HRC's camp has been saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDEaston Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 "The documents are being upgraded at the request of the intelligence community because they contain a category of top secret information," State Department spokesman John Kirby told the AP, calling the withholding of documents in full "not unusual." That means they won't be published online with others being released, even with blacked-out boxes." These emails are being upgraded, so this article is not really the smoking gun some of you hoped it would be. If anything it proves what HRC's camp has been saying. That she doesn't have enough common sense to not send potentially top secret emails over an unsecured server? If she had read the emails and is competent at her job as secretary of state, you would think common sense would have prevailed and told her that it may not be a good idea to toss protocol out the window on potentially highly classified material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
75center Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 That she doesn't have enough common sense to not send potentially top secret emails over an unsecured server? If she had read the emails and is competent at her job as secretary of state, you would think common sense would have prevailed and told her that it may not be a good idea to toss protocol out the window on potentially highly classified material. Her complete failure to protect classified material in order to forward her personal agenda disqualifies her to lead the country. She's dangerous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellcats Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 They are top secret today, but the article was unclear about the status in 2012. I just hope Hillary gets the same punishment as Bush and Cheney. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse James Posted January 30, 2016 Author Share Posted January 30, 2016 Former House Oversight chairman: 'FBI director would like to indict Clinton and Abedin' | Washington Examiner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellcats Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Former House Oversight chairman: 'FBI director would like to indict Clinton and Abedin' | Washington Examiner Issa,another sketchy republican congressman saying he thinks Hillary is guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts