January 31, 201610 yr I can't remember how to google, I fainted and hit my head and suffered a concussion, I might be able to remember how to in about 6 months That's my excuse
January 31, 201610 yr At the end of the day, BO will just pardon her. Unless he has his friends in the Muslim Brotherhood or CAIR make her disappear
January 31, 201610 yr Unless he has his friends in the Muslim Brotherhood or CAIR make her disappear Looks like your Google machine still works.
January 31, 201610 yr Looks like your Google machine still works. No need to google what is common sense or common knowledge
February 1, 201610 yr At the end of the day, BO will just pardon her. Unless he has his friends in the Muslim Brotherhood or CAIR make her disappear I think the la is correct. Not because they are allies but because they seem to have a Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) and certainly a mutual dislike of each other. As far who makes her and Bill dissapear if she is not in the WH next January - its hard to say. They owe many who were counting on HR being Prez. Those mega-donations from foreigners and domestics to the Clinton Foundation where not to help the children of the world.
February 1, 201610 yr While I believe in due process for criminal chages its clear that HR broke the law. The basic facts are direct conflict with so many specific laws and regulations. Indictment, trial, and beyond a reasonable doubt are all used for criminal procedings and may end up in play here. But one should not need to wait for due process to know if someone is so corrupt, so incapable to telling the truth, and has almost a life-long track record of lying in official proceedings that they are completely disqualified for an office.
February 1, 201610 yr Author It's not given she has broken the law. That may be proven in court or it may not due to not enough evidence. That has little to do with party lines and more to do with the justice system. Get on your Google machine and you'll find it. So you dont think she broke the law? Now it turns out that Obama himself emailed her on this email address several times. Do you not think he knew this was not .gov address? So we now have him complicit?
February 1, 201610 yr So you dont think she broke the law? Now it turns out that Obama himself emailed her on this email address several times. Do you not think he knew this was not .gov address? So we now have him complicit? I'll believe she broke the law when she is found guilty. It seems you can read 10 articles on the Internet and 5 say she did and 5 say she didn't. The area seems extremely gray. I said this earlier. How would those above her not know she was using this server and email?
February 1, 201610 yr in other breaking campaign news : Bernie Sanders is leading Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire… setting the stage for an epic battle between the aging socialist and Bernie Sanders." - See more at: NewsBusted: They Might As Well Be Twins, Ya Know
February 1, 201610 yr State Dept. caught in lie also: ?This was all planned?: Former IG says Hillary, State Dept. are lying | New York Post
February 1, 201610 yr Mrs. Clinton has said repeatedly that she never sent or received emails "Marked Classified" at the time the were sent or received. She keeps saying that every time she is asked about this and he campaign repeats it in nearly every response. Maybe they weren't marked "Classified or Top Secret" at the time...does that mean she's clear and has no worries? Lets consider this for a minute...If I know classified or secret information and I email that information to others on a non secure network...did I break the law...even though I didn't tag the email as classified or top secret? That in and of itself is telling that she was sending emails and didn't realize she was sending material that should have been listed as "Classified" or higher. By circumventing the correct process her emails weren't vetted correctly and no one had a chance to see if they should have been Classified before she sent them. Part of the reason, outside of basic security, for using the official servers of the State Department is so that emails can be vetted and tagged as Classified or Top Secret in needed. The reason these Emails are NOW tagged as "Classified" or "Top Secret" is because the state department didn't see them to vet them until they were recovered from her server. I'd be willing to bet that many of those emails should have and would have been listed as "Classified" or "Top Secret" had they went through the proper channels instead of through her closet server. Lastly if China and other countries can hack into Google, Microsoft, Boeing and others...I'm pretty sure they were reading her emails in real time. Did she willfully put people in danger, no I don't think so. Did she through her own hubris show a disregard for the rules that may have endangered others, absolutely. I still think this goes badly for her, and Uncle Joe will be happy to step in to save the party.
February 1, 201610 yr I heard people talking about this today. Even if she somehow escapes criminal prosecution, how does she maintain her security clearance? Can you have a president who does not have top level security clearance? I had not thought of that...
February 2, 201610 yr I heard people talking about this today. Even if she somehow escapes criminal prosecution, how does she maintain her security clearance? Can you have a president who does not have top level security clearance? I had not thought of that... No idea on that. What I don't understand is that you can have someone run for President (and potentially win before the investigation is finished) that is currently being investigated by the FBI. Seems like idiocracy, but what do I know.
February 2, 201610 yr No idea on that. What I don't understand is that you can have someone run for President (and potentially win before the investigation is finished) that is currently being investigated by the FBI. Seems like idiocracy, but what do I know. Trump says we have a Canadian running, so I guess all bets are off this year. Constitution doesn't say anything about being investigated by the FBI. Again innocent until proven guilty, and the court of public opinion doesn't count.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.