Enough for what exactly? Sandusky is not up for debate but there are tons of other issues out there it seems. One thing that bothers me is the missing DA and the hard drive that was erased. Sure would like to know what all that involved.

 

Enough to know he should have never been on campus again and he should not have been allowed to run the Second Mile.

Interesting interview with Jon Ritchie on ESPN's First Take this morning. As someone from Pennsylvania, and who knew Sandusky since he was 14, he offered some insight into why McQuerey may have acted the way he did initially. After listening to him, I will admit I have to take a step back and reassess my initial opinion of him. It doesn't excuse (and neither did Ritchie) the actions (or lack thereof) afterwards.

Enough to know he should have never been on campus again and he should not have been allowed to run the Second Mile.

 

Possible. Do we know who knew of this statement to the police?

Enough to render everyone guilty. JoePa had to know this, the President, the AD...etc. That is not normal behavior. It's enough to tell someone that they can no longer be associated with your program and institution. It's enough to tell someone they are no longer your friend. It's most certainly enough to get everyone that turned a blind eye fired.

 

Do we know who KNEW of this statment to the police or are you just assuming?

I wonder why Joe Pa hired a criminal defense lawyer?

 

 

http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/11/report_former_penn_state_footb.html

 

Wouldn't you, whether or not you were guilty?

^Seeing as he hasn't been charged of anything, and according to you and others, hasn't done anything wrong, why does he need one?

^Seeing as he hasn't been charged of anything, and according to you and others, hasn't done anything wrong, why does he need one?

 

Are you serious???? Mainly because of people like you who have already convicted him. Also, please point out my post where I said he hasn't done anything wrong. I don't know the facts and neither do you. But I am willing to wait for it to play out. I know you're young but please google Richard Jewel.

^ I doubt he knows what, if anything he can be charged with. If I were him, given the mob like mentality that has evolved to this point, I'd hire one in a heart beat. If for no other reason, to find out where I stood.

Because every staff member has not been shown to be aware of it?

I imagine that's what's coming though.

 

 

Please tell me you really dont think every staff member wasn't aware.

Please tell me you really dont think every staff member wasn't aware.

 

I don't know and neither do you. How big is PA St's staff? You don't think there's secrets on a staff that large? I worked for a company of 17 people for years as the top financial person and after I left I found out some things about one of the managers that just shocked me. I talked to these people every day for many years and was very close to many of them. It's a possiblity, don't you think?

Well we know the janitor knew

Wouldn't you, whether or not you were guilty?

 

^Seeing as he hasn't been charged of anything, and according to you and others, hasn't done anything wrong, why does he need one?

 

^ This. If I wasn't charged with anything and I wasn't guilty of anything I don't see a reason I would need a lawyer.... yet.

Do we know who KNEW of this statment to the police or are you just assuming?

 

based on evidence in the grand jury report, that people in some of the highest positions of leadership at Penn State knew about Sandusky's sexual abuse as long ago as 1998 and had engaged in large-scale institutional cover up.

 

http://ology.com/sports/scandal-happy-valley-timeline-jerry-sandusky-story

 

If you don't think the head coach, President, VP, and AD don't know when their employee is questionned by police, I don't know what to tell you.

Are you serious???? Mainly because of people like you who have already convicted him. Also, please point out my post where I said he hasn't done anything wrong. I don't know the facts and neither do you. But I am willing to wait for it to play out. I know you're young but please google Richard Jewel.

 

I'm young, not stupid. I know who Richard Jewell is.

^ This. If I wasn't charged with anything and I wasn't guilty of anything I don't see a reason I would need a lawyer.... yet.

 

See Swamprat's post above.