July 31, 200818 yr Wouldn't he have been considered a Type A FA? If so, doesn't that mean they would have received 2 1st round picks for him after this season?
July 31, 200818 yr :thumb:Like I said before this trade had nothing to do with getting value in return. Your right, but it hurts when you trade a HOF'er for a bag of peanuts. Even though those peanuts are worth a lot of money.
July 31, 200818 yr :thumb:Like I said before this trade had nothing to do with getting value in return. :thumb:
July 31, 200818 yr This offical, he approved per ESPN Radio. See Ya Griffey. :dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa:dancingpa
July 31, 200818 yr :thumb: Only stat that matters is their salary and years on contract in this deal.To be honest if the Reds are paying the remaining 4 mil on the contract, i don't get it.
July 31, 200818 yr To be honest if the Reds are paying the remaining 4 mil on the contract, i don't get it. That's Cincinnati baseball at it's finest...:thumb:
July 31, 200818 yr To be honest if the Reds are paying the remaining 4 mil on the contract, i don't get it. Should mean they are free of the 4 million to decline his option...
July 31, 200818 yr Pretty unimpressive stats for these two guys, especially Masset. This year, Masset has done poorly. Check out his last year's stats.
July 31, 200818 yr I can't believe they'd fall any. I mean, seriously, is there anyone out there these days that is buying a ticket to see Griffey fail to catch routine fly balls, generally not hustle, and hit under .250? Like it or not, he is still one of the best players to suit up and he's a fan favorite (especially to younger kids).
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.