July 29, 200719 yr Great article that pretty much sums up what HSSB has been preaching for the past couple of years. Adam Dunn
July 29, 200719 yr We do need to eventually get rid of one of our corner outfielders to make room for Bruce, Unfortuntaly we can't because they are our two biggest bats.
July 29, 200719 yr Amongst other issues, the SOs are just a killer. Striking out 1/3 of the time in the middle of the lineup is unacceptable.
July 29, 200719 yr Striking out 1/3 of the time in the middle of the lineup is unacceptable. Let me know when the Phillies deal Ryan Howard.
July 29, 200719 yr Let me know when the Phillies deal Ryan Howard. Wow! your putting Dunn in Ryan Howard company?? 2005 Rookie of the year 2006 NL POY 2006 Silver Slugger If Dunn ever hits 58 Hrs and drives in 149 ever in a season there will be nothing but love from me Mr. Dunn, I know Ryan Howard. And believe me when I say sir, you are no Ryann Howard.
July 29, 200719 yr Great article that pretty much sums up what HSSB has been preaching for the past couple of years. Adam Dunn And 98.
July 29, 200719 yr Good article and makes a great argument to keep Dunn and it makes sense. But here's my only issue. With some progress from the Reds' bullpen pitchers and by adding a good starter or two - say Bailey puts together a nice season, and the Reds add another starter in the offseason - pitching could improve by 60 runs. How can you add a "good starter or two" financially and keep Dunn without raising the payroll? I don't think they raise the payroll in the offseason. They'll keep Dunn to give Mackanin a shot at finishing the season strong and take the job fulltime, hope that Livingston and Dumatrait can step up and possibly add a retread starter in the offseason, after giving Dunn his $13 million. If that's what happens, things will only change for the better if the younger bullpen arms improve to save the starters. I'm not against Dunn and like I've posted before, nobody should doubt his talent. But am I wrong to assume that the Reds can't afford to add "a good starter or two" and sign Dunn both without raising the payroll?
July 29, 200719 yr Good article and makes a great argument to keep Dunn and it makes sense. But here's my only issue. With some progress from the Reds' bullpen pitchers and by adding a good starter or two - say Bailey puts together a nice season, and the Reds add another starter in the offseason - pitching could improve by 60 runs. How can you add a "good starter or two" financially and keep Dunn without raising the payroll? I don't think they raise the payroll in the offseason. They'll keep Dunn to give Mackanin a shot at finishing the season strong and take the job fulltime, hope that Livingston and Dumatrait can step up and possibly add a retread starter in the offseason, after giving Dunn his $13 million. If that's what happens, things will only change for the better if the younger bullpen arms improve to save the starters. I'm not against Dunn and like I've posted before, nobody should doubt his talent. But am I wrong to assume that the Reds can't afford to add "a good starter or two" and sign Dunn both without raising the payroll? They will be able to add one solid starter with the money from Milton's contract...
July 29, 200719 yr Say the Reds trade Dunn, and use that money, coupled with the Milton cash, and throw the bank at Zambrano.....Would you guys be willing to part with Dunn if it meant adding an arm like Carlos'?
July 29, 200719 yr Interesting idea but I don't think a team with a payroll like the Reds will pay another pitcher that kind of money.
July 29, 200719 yr Interesting idea but I don't think a team with a payroll like the Reds will pay another pitcher that kind of money. But we're talking about the type of Ace that could make this team an instant contender....I think they would throw some serious cash his way.
July 29, 200719 yr Doesn't he want like 18-19 Mil?? Which is what they would have available with Dunn and Milton off the books...I would love to see him in Cincy.
July 29, 200719 yr He's not a very good teammate obviously and thats a whole lot of jack for a small market team to pay someone that doesn't play everyday.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.