It was asked if UC fans are happy or bitter for Mick, but how about UK fans with Juzang? You have to imagine he would have been a great asset to UK this year considering his success at UCLA. 

1 hour ago, GrantNKY said:

It was asked if UC fans are happy or bitter for Mick, but how about UK fans with Juzang? You have to imagine he would have been a great asset to UK this year considering his success at UCLA. 

I think the question about Mick is fair, especially considering how many UC fans I've seen on Twitter give their opinion on it, mainly happy for him.

As for Juzang, for me personally, I'm not bitter.  I think he would have been able to do a lot of things for UK that he's doing for UCLA this year.  Just hard to play him more time last year without taking it from Quickley or Maxey.  But this year, he could have flourished for the Wildcats, at least offensively.  Hopefully sophomore Juzang = sophomore Dontae Allen.

20 hours ago, MJAlltheWay24 said:

Are UC fans happy for Mick? Or bitter given the current turmoil in Clifton?

Glad to see him being successful. Fun team to watch. Lob dunk on inbounds play was cool. Guy sure has won a few games for a person that can't coach lol.

Happy for Juzang. I wish he was still a Wildcat though. Bama couldn’t handle the pressure of the BIG stage.

3 hours ago, Tomcats1990 said:

Happy for Juzang. I wish he was still a Wildcat though. Bama couldn’t handle the pressure of the BIG stage.

I guess if that is the case. Then Oats is out as a possible candidate to replace Cal then too. ?

On 3/29/2021 at 1:42 PM, Voice of Reason said:

For those who watched the game, what are your thoughts on the officials overruling the call in the last minute or so when the ball went between the legs of the Alabama player?

 My thought is I saw nothing conclusive on the video to over rule the call. Speculating about the player's shorts moving is why you overruled the call? The kid was moving as he dribbled so his shorts are going to move.  What happened to needing clear and conclusive proof to over rule a call?  I am seeing this more and more in instant reply situations, where the officials have now turned instant replay into another judgment call versus seeing clear proof to change a call.

Pre replay that call would have been made instantly, Alabama ball, nothing about shorts moving....play on. Replay totally ruins the flow of the game. Sometimes it's like a 5 minute ordeal.....a mini half time lol.

4 minutes ago, 9068 said:

Pre replay that call would have been made instantly, Alabama ball, nothing about shorts moving....play on. Replay totally ruins the flow of the game. Sometimes it's like a 5 minute ordeal.....a mini half time lol.

Agree, the replay process often ruins the flow of a game.  I am not saying I have a solution, but I hate the long breaks in play.

35 minutes ago, theguru said:

Agree, the replay process often ruins the flow of a game.  I am not saying I have a solution, but I hate the long breaks in play.

 

40 minutes ago, 9068 said:

Pre replay that call would have been made instantly, Alabama ball, nothing about shorts moving....play on. Replay totally ruins the flow of the game. Sometimes it's like a 5 minute ordeal.....a mini half time lol.

I am not anti-replay, but I question what in the hell are we doing sometimes. My proposal is you get 60 seconds to review any and all footage that exists. If a determination can't be made in that time, the call stands.

52 minutes ago, bugatti said:

 

I am not anti-replay, but I question what in the hell are we doing sometimes. My proposal is you get 60 seconds to review any and all footage that exists. If a determination can't be made in that time, the call stands.

I say 30.

The one that has started to happen and bugs the living daylights out of me is ball smacked out of the hand of a player. Then they go to replay and it looks like the player who had the ball smacked out of his hands had the tip of his finger on the ball after it was smacked. Come on people. If somebody smacks the ball out of the guy's hands he knocked it out of bounds. Move on!

1 hour ago, bugatti said:

 

I am not anti-replay, but I question what in the hell are we doing sometimes. My proposal is you get 60 seconds to review any and all footage that exists. If a determination can't be made in that time, the call stands.

 

45 minutes ago, tcjkbt said:

I say 30.

I want to say yes to a time limit but if they get it wrong and further review would have eventually "proved" it was wrong, that it will just be another negative with the process. 

In some ways artificial intelligence can't get here soon enough. 

9 minutes ago, theguru said:

I want to say yes to a time limit but if they get it wrong and further review would have eventually "proved" it was wrong, that it will just be another negative with the process. 

In some ways artificial intelligence can't get here soon enough. 

 I see your point there but if they will just stick with the clear and obvious, or conclusive proof, standard it will help.  They get one minute to look at the tape and if there is no obvious reason to overturn it, time to move on.  In the last couple of years I have seen many replay reviews where I felt that they wrongly overturned a call  and it usually happens when they look at the thing for 5 minutes and analyze themself into the wrong decision. One minute. If there is nothing obvious to overturn the call, the call stands.

2 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

 I see your point there but if they will just stick with the clear and obvious, or conclusive proof, standard it will help.  They get one minute to look at the tape and if there is no obvious reason to overturn it, time to move on.  In the last couple of years I have seen many replay reviews where I felt that they wrongly overturned a call  and it usually happens when they look at the thing for 5 minutes and analyze themself into the wrong decision. One minute. If there is nothing obvious to overturn the call, the call stands.

I agree the replay process needs work.  I assume the NFL still sends all replays to New York for review which I like but that is not feasible with so many games.

Is there any discussion of this by the NCAA?

Most on here think about Mick Cronin the former UC coach. I think of Mick Cronin the former Murray State coach. I like to think his time in Murray prepared him for all the success he has had in life as a coach ?

15 minutes ago, bugatti said:

Most on here think about Mick Cronin the former UC coach. I think of Mick Cronin the former Murray State coach. I like to think his time in Murray prepared him for all the success he has had in life as a coach ?

Growing up as the son of coach Hep Cronin didn't hurt him either.