theguru Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 I am going with 34,200 and I am taking the under. What is your opinion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bugatti Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 What? So are you setting 34,200 and asking if we will take the o/u? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theguru Posted March 19, 2020 Author Share Posted March 19, 2020 What? So are you setting 34,200 and asking if we will take the o/u? Correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDeuce Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 What? So are you setting 34,200 and asking if we will take the o/u? Don't take the bait. :lol2: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theguru Posted March 19, 2020 Author Share Posted March 19, 2020 Don't take the bait. :lol2: Or we could make it more straightforward, how many people do you believe will die from COVID-19 in America in 2020? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All Blue Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 Under. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDEaston Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 I don't think we will ever really know, but with the numbers we're given I'll take the under. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrantNKY Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 I’ll be bold and say under 15,000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gchs_uk9 Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 I don't think we will ever really know, but with the numbers we're given I'll take the under. Agreed. As with elderly people who have various ailments but ultimately die of pneumonia, I think this virus will unfortunately finish off a lot of folks with existing illnesses. The lack of testing will likely mean they died of their illness and not coronavirus. So it could be a kind of a chicken/egg issue where we never really know the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theguru Posted March 19, 2020 Author Share Posted March 19, 2020 I don't think we will ever really know, but with the numbers we're given I'll take the under. Agreed. As with elderly people who have various ailments but ultimately die of pneumonia, I think this virus will unfortunately finish off a lot of folks with existing illnesses. The lack of testing will likely mean they died of their illness and not coronavirus. So it could be a kind of a chicken/egg issue where we never really know the answer. I just saw this out of Italy: More than 99% of Italy’s coronavirus fatalities were people who suffered from previous medical conditions, according to a study by the country’s national health authority. Source: ISS Italy National Health Institute, March 17 sample Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voice of Reason Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 Total deaths worldwide at this point 10,015. Take the under. The oddsmaker set a really bad line. Congratulations to our world on saving thousands and thousands of lives. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDEaston Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 Total deaths worldwide at this point 10,015. Take the under. The oddsmaker set a really bad line. Congratulations to our world on saving thousands and thousands of lives. I imagine the oddsmaker knew what he was doing when he set that number and it's not a bad number when you consider comparing it to other viruses we deal with on a regular basis. Going back to that though I believe the response to this particular virus will stop it well before it hits the betting line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluegrasscard Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 Counting solely from COVID-19 or are comorbidity deaths included? Former - under (way under). Latter - maybe over but will go the under still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theguru Posted March 19, 2020 Author Share Posted March 19, 2020 I imagine the oddsmaker knew what he was doing when he set that number and it's not a bad number when you consider comparing it to other viruses we deal with on a regular basis. Going back to that though I believe the response to this particular virus will stop it well before it hits the betting line. I want to give you a big kiss @JDEaston Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDEaston Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 I want to give you a big kiss @JDEaston You've been out at the bars and such lately. So maybe at a later date haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts