BREAKING: After Team Trump Denies Trump Shared Classified Information With Russia, Trump Tweets That He Did 'Share With Russia' | Daily Wire

 

How would you like to be a part of that team?:banghead:

So you're advocating for criminal activity because these are people you don't like? Or am I misreading this?

 

I am just stating where we are as a country. Nothing more.

Please excuse POTUS for declassifying information WITHOUT FIRST SOLICITING A DONATION TO HIS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION!

 

Do all Trump missteps get excused because Clinton, Obama or some other Democrat did something wrong?

Do all Trump missteps get excused because Clinton, Obama or some other Democrat did something wrong?

 

Is it a miss step if its coming from an unnamed Wash Post source? Do you really think these folks are reporting news based on CORROBORATED FACTS?

I post this before I get to page two of posts....however, page 1 shows me yet AGAIN, that there are those who immediately jump on the bandwagon with no credible facts because it suits their agenda. To many, including myself, this just solidifies further how polluted Washington has become over the past years, and had we elected someone who endorsed or further solidified the sewage, our chances of change would become even more remote. Facts are, a nice guy, or a guy only interested in playing politics wouldn't get anything done.

Is it a miss step if its coming from an unnamed Wash Post source? Do you really think these folks are reporting news based on CORROBORATED FACTS?

 

You mean the facts that Trump himself corroborated with his tweets?

 

But that isn't the point of my post. My point is every time Trump gets question about something you act like the fact that Clinton, Obama or some other Democrat did something just as bad means it is okay for Trump to do it.

You mean the facts that Trump himself corroborated with his tweets?

 

But that isn't the point of my post. My point is every time Trump gets question about something you act like the fact that Clinton, Obama or some other Democrat did something just as bad means it is okay for Trump to do it.

 

It is more of a commentary on critics of a lawful disclosure who are silent on unlawful disclosures.

I post this before I get to page two of posts....however, page 1 shows me yet AGAIN, that there are those who immediately jump on the bandwagon with no credible facts because it suits their agenda. To many, including myself, this just solidifies further how polluted Washington has become over the past years, and had we elected someone who endorsed or further solidified the sewage, our chances of change would become even more remote. Facts are, a nice guy, or a guy only interested in playing politics wouldn't get anything done.

 

So do Trump's tweets confirm anything in your eyes?

 

The White House is dealing with its second crisis in one week, now that President Trump has basically confirmed that he shared highly classified information with Russia.

 

Analysis | 3 big takeaways from Trump’s Russia-classified info blunder

 

More from the article:

 

Even in the story Monday, The Post's Greg Miller and Greg Jaffe acknowledged that Trump probably didn't break any laws. The reason this is a big deal to the intelligence community sources they spoke to is because it risks jeopardizing a key tool in the fight against the Islamic State by tipping Russia off to this information. By discussing a specific ISIS plot and the city in which it was detected, the officials say, it's quite possible Russia could surmise the source and methods used to collect that information.

 

In addition to aiding an adversarial foreign power like Russia and potentially jeopardizing a key source, it could also give other allies cold feet about working with the U.S. government, for fear that their identities won't be closely safeguarded by the president and his administration.

 

Just saw on a banner blast that the company that had provided the US and Trump with the intel was Israel. If true, they probably aren't too happy right now.

It is more of a commentary on critics of a lawful disclosure who are silent on unlawful disclosures.

 

So, just because it is lawful it is okay then?

 

Lawful doesn't equal prudent if true. This is particularly the case if the country that provided the intel (some are citing Israel is the one but hasn't been confirmed) isn't happy then the US link to this kind of aid may dry up. Lawful, yes. Smart, no. Dangerous, Oh yeah.

Knowing who owns The Post and the reason he bought it will give a clear understanding of their agenda.. Their sole purpose is to destroy political enemies.

Knowing who owns The Post and the reason he bought it will give a clear understanding of their agenda.. Their sole purpose is to destroy political enemies.

 

So it didn't happen in your opinion and the story is completely untrue?

So it didn't happen in your opinion and the story is completely untrue?

Nope... Just not the big deal the media wants everyone to believe..

Nope... Just not the big deal the media wants everyone to believe..

 

I would further define it by saying left leaning media.

Nope... Just not the big deal the media wants everyone to believe..

 

I am going with this for now.

delete