For the record, the thought that voters will somehow base their vote for POTUS on the head of the party is laughable.

 

Heck, too many of them can't even name the current VP or ONE SCOTUS justice.

 

You think they can name the DNC head?

History tells me you're a pretty smart cat so I'm going to just write the above off.

 

Dude is also 6'0 tall and overweight. Didn't mention that in the thread title. Also didn't post in the OP that white voters may have problems with 6'0 overweight guys.

 

Come on. He posted the word "black" because he wanted to post the word "black" as part of the , in his opinion, idiocy.

 

 

We might disagree on many things but it was not my intention at all to insinuate a black guy couldnt do this job , or any other job for that matter . Not at all what my intent was . I'm actually sorry it came across to you that way .

History tells me you're a pretty smart cat so I'm going to just write the above off.

 

Dude is also 6'0 tall and overweight. Didn't mention that in the thread title. Also didn't post in the OP that white voters may have problems with 6'0 overweight guys.

 

Come on. He posted the word "black" because he wanted to post the word "black" as part of the , in his opinion, idiocy.

 

Thanks for the vote of confidence.

 

I just don't read too much into peoples posts. I'm a common sense kinda guy. Don't try to pick everything apart.

 

To be honest, I never gave the OP title a second thought. Just like a post starting about me and it said "Middle aged white guy with a goatee".

And how much praise did Donald Trump heap on the Clinton's until it was politically expedient not to do so?

 

This argument won't hunt.

Too much. I only removed my signature picture on another web site a couple of days ago. It said that I was not voting for Hillary or Hillary's donor. I got nauseous at the prospect of another Clinton presidency and cast a vote for Trump, which was nothing but a hail Mary vote against Hillary.

 

I am still not absolutely sure that the Clintons did not recruit Trump to wreak havoc upon the Republican nomination process and reneged on the bargain.

 

As for a dog not hunting, pretending that good character is a prerequisite for a candidate for the DNC Chair position is a non-hunting dog. I really do not care if the DNC wants to name Farrakhan himself to the position. The only important criterion for the job seems to be that the Chairperson not get caught cheating.

Edited November 17, 20169 yr by Dino Nova

I hope the D's do make him the DNC chair...this guy may be left of Crazy Bernie and Liz Warren. I did not think that was possible. Keep going further left D's...

I agree. Please make him the chair. :banana:

History tells me you're a pretty smart cat so I'm going to just write the above off.

 

Dude is also 6'0 tall and overweight. Didn't mention that in the thread title. Also didn't post in the OP that white voters may have problems with 6'0 overweight guys.

 

Come on. He posted the word "black" because he wanted to post the word "black" as part of the , in his opinion, idiocy.

 

Delete

History tells me you're a pretty smart cat so I'm going to just write the above off.

 

Dude is also 6'0 tall and overweight. Didn't mention that in the thread title. Also didn't post in the OP that white voters may have problems with 6'0 overweight guys.

 

Come on. He posted the word "black" because he wanted to post the word "black" as part of the , in his opinion, idiocy.

 

Unfortunately, color still matters when looking for deficiencies.

 

Hard to believe in 2016, but here we are.

Unfortunately, color still matters when looking for deficiencies.

 

Hard to believe in 2016, but here we are.

 

For some maybe, not for me.

Not how I operate either.

Sure makes a guy wonder, though.

Sure makes a guy wonder, though.

 

Well, you can wonder no more. :thumb:

Not how I operate either.

 

Glad to hear it.

 

Just think, though, how much of this could have been avoided had the thread title been:

 

"So the Dems might nominate former Farrakhan associate to lead the national party"

 

or even better yet:

 

So the Dems might nominate Keith Ellison to lead the national party"

 

 

Can you see the difference?

:lol2: :lol2: :lol2:

We're still pretending the title wasn't on purpose, or that the wording doesn't matter?