If Farrakhan was the person being considered...

Farrakan's associate is being considered and Keith Ellison has defended Farrikan in the past. After working 18 months with Farrakhan and coming under heavy criticism about his ties to him, Ellison finally did the politically expedient thing and acknowledged Farrakhan's deep seeded racism. My reference to Farrakhan goes to Ellison's judgment, Your Honor.

 

I personally think that Keith Ellison is a wonderful fit for the DNC, following in the footsteps of Debbie Wasserman Shultz and Donna Brazile. Could he really be less ethical than his predecessors? I doubt it.

I couldn't, either. But it evidently is something of a big deal to others.

 

Nope.

 

I think there are some on here that are trying to spin others words into it being a big deal.

Farrakan's associate is being considered and Keith Ellison has defended Farrikan in the past. After working 18 months with Farrakhan and coming under heavy criticism about his ties to him, Ellison finally did the politically expedient thing and acknowledged Farrakhan's deep seeded racism. My reference to Farrakhan goes to Ellison's judgment, Your Honor.

 

I personally think that Keith Ellison is a wonderful fit for the DNC, following in the footsteps of Debbie Wasserman Shultz and Donna Brazile. Could he really be less ethical than his predecessors? I doubt it.

 

And how much praise did Donald Trump heap on the Clinton's until it was politically expedient not to do so?

 

This argument won't hunt.

Are some of you closet democrats? I honestly don't get the concern for DNC workings.

Heck, I would just set over and laugh if you guys promoted racists in the RNC because I would know that in 2016 that wouldn't fly in America...wait....:sorry::(

Equating a few good words about a former president and working 18 months for the Nation of Islam and Farakan ? Yeah right.

Equating a few good words about a former president and working 18 months for the Nation of Islam and Farakan ? Yeah right.

 

You might go back and see how close Trump was with the Clintons in the 90's. I'm not even pointing out the money he gave them over the years. It was a lot longer than 18 months.

 

Still won't hunt.

Equating a few good words about a former president and working 18 months for the Nation of Islam and Farakan ? Yeah right.

 

Trump Voters Are Hillary’s New Best Friends - POLITICO Magazine

Equating a few good words about a former president and working 18 months for the Nation of Islam and Farakan ? Yeah right.

 

Donald Trump and Bill Clinton: Behind the ‘Bromance’ - The Daily Beast

Equating a few good words about a former president and working 18 months for the Nation of Islam and Farakan ? Yeah right.

 

A Brief History of Donald Trump and Bill Clinton’s Friendship

You mean big business guy Trump tried to buy political favor by slithering up to a politician ? Shocking I tell ya , Cmon Hatz . FWIW I don't have a problem with anyone supporting Ole Slick Willie , he was a fine president . But the democrat party of Bill's time in office isn't the same democrat party of today. That's my point , the party is sprinting far left when they need to wake up and accept the fact America isn't along with the ride anymore . They let an egotistic, nutty , trash talkin' outsider beat them , and their answer is pick a even further left person to be the face of the party ? Brilliant as the funny commercial used to say . Yes I am laughing at the thought of it . I hope it happens .

Nope.

 

I think there are some on here that are trying to spin others words into it being a big deal.

 

 

Spin?

Spin?

 

Yep.

 

Trying to paint it as a big deal or that the OP has a problem with blacks or Muslims due to his description of Mr. Ellison.

Are some of you closet democrats? I honestly don't get the concern for DNC workings.

Heck, I would just set over and laugh if you guys promoted racists in the RNC because I would know that in 2016 that wouldn't fly in America...wait....:sorry::(

 

:lol2: :lol2: :thumb:

Yep.

 

Trying to paint it as a big deal or that the OP has a problem with blacks or Muslims due to his description of Mr. Ellison.

 

So he says the Ds screwed up by considering a black Muslim because of the white voters and we're supposed to only talk about the Muslim aspect?

 

We should not talk about the "black" part of the equation even though he finally said it would be a potential problem for white voters?

 

That's what you call "spin?"

the mission of the Muslim Brotherhood is, quote, ‘destroying Western civilization from within,’ by its own hands, basically. That’s a quote.”

 

If the Dems do go with him, then they do have total disregard for America and the American culture. To put a person in this postion with ties to a group trying to destroy America and American Culture is just STUPID. He will be the anti christian leader.

So all you so called Christian Democrats better not be wishing or supporting this person.

 

 

Muslim Brotherhood-linked Congressman Keith Ellison announces run for DNC chair