That's all well and good, but they didn't.

 

Bottom line - conservative-leaning men are generally gonna make sure that they can get their rocks off, and the consequences for those with whom said rocks are getting off be damned.

 

Cheap, disgusting post. I was stating the obvious and made the comment that I believe that the little pills should be left off as well. Maybe everyone is not in the trash world that you assume most live in.

Oh, I don't doubt that impregnating women is party-blind. But it seems to me that those doing the deciding on the issues lean right.

Interesting theory. Odd part is in this case, those doing the deciding are doing so because of a law that gives them the right to do so and that law was cosponsored by a liberal who now bemoans that right and was signed into law by the liberal patron saint Bill Clinton and said law also gave them that right because of a horribly framed law known as The Affordable Health Care Act that was rammed down the countries throat by an even more liberal president Obama. But, we must blame the conservatives and ignore any and all blame that rightfully falls on the liberals.

I think it's terrific how the left has made the stretch to get this conversation on male enhancement meds. Diversion and tangential conversation. It's crafty.

That's all well and good, but they didn't.

 

Bottom line - conservative-leaning men are generally gonna make sure that they can get their rocks off, and the consequences for those with whom said rocks are getting off be damned.

 

Well...except for the 14 others choices that a woman has to protect herself from a non-planned pregnancy...but we won't bring that up since it doesn't fit so nicely in the left's neat little package.

Rather than argue the silly male enhancement vs contraceptive debate I decided to find out if condoms and vasectomies are covered under Obamacare without cost. Anyone care to guess the answer? Just another example of the Democrats war on men which has led to that huge gender gap. I think I have a good cause for a discrimination suit based on the fact that the act has items specific to women but not to men. Anyone care to join me in a class action? Or will we do what conservative men have always done and suck it up and pay our own way?

Just another example of the Democrats war on men which has led to that huge gender gap.

That's a good one ... Dems' war on men ... I tip my hat. I now look for Mitch Rapp to borrow the phrase in every post of his through November.

Can we use it along with the liberal War on Babies?

Is the hyperbole that libs hate babies and more over the top the the :poop: that the libs are producing regarding this decision?

Is the hyperbole that libs hate babies and more over the top the the :poop: that the libs are producing regarding this decision?

Your rant makes no sense.

I think it's terrific how the left has made the stretch to get this conversation on male enhancement meds. Diversion and tangential conversation. It's crafty.

 

Crafty is my middle name.:thumb:

Well...except for the 14 others choices that a woman has to protect herself from a non-planned pregnancy...but we won't bring that up since it doesn't fit so nicely in the left's neat little package.

 

Which is why I wonder why some are excluded.

Crafty is my middle name.:thumb:

 

Doesn't hurt that so many of us are like Meerkats when male enhancement is mentioned. I can picture everybody sitting up straight to get closer to the screen.

So the logical stretch is to say it's a conservative problem across the board. And only conservatives use male enhancement pills. Do you disagree that's how you portrayed it?

 

If so, that was not my intent; I am often clumsy with words. My intent was reproductive legal/lawmaking as opposed to babymaking.

You're saying study after study indicates we don't have a gender gap ... or are you just arguing equal pay? Share a couple of these studies with the board. You also might want to offer your own explanation as to why we have a 20-point gender gap. Or is this fiction too?

 

If there actually was a war on women as is asserted so often, wouldn't the gender gap be much higher than 20 points? Like triple or quadruple? Haven't women tended to lean democrat for decades?

 

The biggest reason I question the war on women is that the people I know who are the most opposed to the idea of the war on women, are women I have political discussions with who strongly disagree with the idea. Granted I do know other women who agree with the term, I would think if the war on women is legitimate, it would be more universally agreed upon.

I happen to believe that the phrase "war on women" is hyperbole, FWIW.