September 7, 201115 yr Yes and no. Don't tell me those kids that go to Stanford or some of these other great academic institutions couldn't get into ND. Problem is, they no longer corner the market. And I explained why it would in post #104. Cutting edge is cutting edge, annually. No, they don't corner the market in that field, but there aren't that many teams with ND or Stanford's demands. When everyone chimes in, it ain't cutting edge anymore, they'll need something more.
September 7, 201115 yr But...if indeed the reason they're coming to those schools is the uniforms then when everyone else does it they lose any edge they had. Then what do they have to keep these kids coming? Seems like uniforms would be an easy thing to compete with and in a few years Oregon and Boise are going to need some new gimmick. Oregon, for instance, is a successful football team who has the potential to vie for the title each year. That's what they recruit on now. Their unis are an added bonus, but even if every school had them Oregon would recruit on their recent success and contender status, which many have argued the unis helped them attract the initial talent that contributed to that success. It's true that as more schools adopt updated uniforms there will be a depreciating return on them, but at that point they will be the norm.
September 7, 201115 yr Oregon, for instance, is a successful football team who has the potential to vie for the title each year. That's what they recruit on now. Their unis are an added bonus, but even if every school had them Oregon would recruit on their recent success and contender status, which many have argued the unis helped them attract the initial talent that contributed to that success. It's true that as more schools adopt updated uniforms there will be a depreciating return on them, but at that point they will be the norm.I hope they continue to be successful, you may be right, their past success may be enough to keep them going. I hope so, I'd hate to think uniforms is all they have going. Not talking about you here, Habib. Funny how I see people knocking Notre Dame in this thread and another one as washed up. They rank 4th all time in most wins in NCAA history, started ranked this year and very well may end up ranked, yet some think they're done. I disagree. Sure they had a rough run for a while, but they're far from washed up.
September 9, 201115 yr Author You didn't even read the article did you? Kids are saying it, and stupid or not its the way it is, get used to it. Adapt and move forward or get left behind...no one in here is saying you have to do it those schools with 100 year old traditions of winning do not have to but to dog the schools who do not have the tradition for doing whatever they can to contend and improve is asinine. I am sorry, maybe I've forgotten. Remind me when Miami, Va Tech, Oregon, Maryland, or any other cartoon football team won a National Championship. As far as any kid playing now can remember it has been a team with traditional uniforms or am I forgetting someone? (Don't give me The "U" in the '80's)
September 9, 201115 yr Author There are only a handful of traditional power "football programs." There are a lot more schools out there that aren't competitive, don't win, and have traditions of failure. Why do you fault some of them for going out and upgrading their uniforms, building nice stadiums, state-of-the-art field houses, etc. and getting their schools noticed? By the way, Ohio State, LSU, and Navy will unveil new Nike Pro Combat uniforms this year. Alabama, Florida, and Ohio State each began wearing them last year. It seems like even the traditional powerhouses want in on it. So by your reasoning, Navy will be in a BCS Bowl this year and/or recruit a Heisman candidate next year? Not hardly. After all, if garish (you might have to look that one up) uniforms are an indicator, then Army would have take the crystal trophy a couple of years ago with the hideous digital camo uni's.
September 9, 201115 yr ^ That's exactly the point Bench is making. They're attempting to stand out in a different way to these recruits in order to give them some sort of edge against schools with a massive alumni base and a century of football excellence. "Come here instead because it might be fun" doesn't really do the job. You need something to put you out in front of those big-time schools.
September 9, 201115 yr I am sorry, maybe I've forgotten. Remind me when Miami, Va Tech, Oregon, Maryland, or any other cartoon football team won a National Championship. As far as any kid playing now can remember it has been a team with traditional uniforms or am I forgetting someone? (Don't give me The "U" in the '80's) Miami won one in 2001. Not really that long ago....
September 9, 201115 yr So by your reasoning, Navy will be in a BCS Bowl this year and/or recruit a Heisman candidate next year? Not hardly. After all, if garish (you might have to look that one up) uniforms are an indicator, then Army would have take the crystal trophy a couple of years ago with the hideous digital camo uni's. No, that's a severe misinterpretation of my reasoning. I've said that schools use the new uniforms to make themselves more attractive and that I believe it will eventually become the norm. I invoked Navy to show that even more traditional, conservative schools were adopting the new uniform designs.
September 9, 201115 yr No, they don't corner the market in that field, but there aren't that many teams with ND or Stanford's demands. When everyone chimes in, it ain't cutting edge anymore, they'll need something more. You haven't been paying attention. Oregon is always 1st and better. ALWAYS! No way Phil Knight lets another Nike school get the edge on Oregon...no chance.
September 9, 201115 yr Miami won one in 2001. Not really that long ago....When you're 20, that was half a lifetime ago. When you're 50, it was yesterday.
September 9, 201115 yr When you're 20, that was half a lifetime ago. When you're 50, it was yesterday. Well then no teams other than USC, Texas, Florida, LSU, Alabama, or Auburn need apply. It is not as if at least one of those schools hasn't had a stinker. But I'm sure it was all about the uniforms when players decided to go to those places. And I say that as someone very much in favor of traditional style uniforms.
September 9, 201115 yr You haven't been paying attention. Oregon is always 1st and better. ALWAYS! No way Phil Knight lets another Nike school get the edge on Oregon...no chance. NONE
September 9, 201115 yr You haven't been paying attention. Oregon is always 1st and better. ALWAYS! No way Phil Knight lets another Nike school get the edge on Oregon...no chance.If you say so, time will tell. I just have to wonder how long the uniform thing will stay big, unless you haven't been paying attention, kids change what drives them quickly and often. Might not be long before the uniform thing just isn't cool enough anymore.
September 9, 201115 yr A kid UK is recruiting for basketball today said he doesn't like Baylor because their uniforms are ugly.
September 10, 201115 yr If you say so, time will tell. I just have to wonder how long the uniform thing will stay big, unless you haven't been paying attention, kids change what drives them quickly and often. Might not be long before the uniform thing just isn't cool enough anymore. Right, college kids hate going to the school that gets the most Nike gear for free.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.