Jimmy Dykes just on ESPN2 said UK got robbed on the No Call and that it was Crime!!!!!

Not that I agree but ESPN gamenight before the SEC final- Steve lavin and Jimmy Dykes ( I think) both agreed that UK was robbed. Not saying I agree or disagree but they did mention if it was a foul at the start of the game, it should of been called at the end, regardless what the situation is or was.

You realize Tom Eades, the official closest to the play, is from Muhlenberg County and graduated from Central City High?

Bottom Line if UK shouldn't have been in a position to rely on a ref's call.

Bottom Line if UK shouldn't have been in a position to rely on a ref's call.

 

Yes, but after one of the luckiest 3's ever, they were.

Has anyone ever seen this called? Teams consistently try it and they never call it. I guess someone got it called somewhere along the line to get it to be run all the time.

 

It's all a non issue since Porter gave UK no chance at making a play anyway when he did throw it.

After the game, BCG just slapped the Georgia's staff and players hands while chasing the refs. I thought that was a low class move on BCG toward a Georgia team that played their heart out.

After the game, BCG just slapped the Georgia's staff and players hands while chasing the refs. I thought that was a low class move on BCG toward a Georgia team that played their heart out.

 

But on the news he was giving Georgia all the credit for the victory.No excuses they whipped us he said.

It wasn't a foul because they didn't call it a foul.

 

 

The UG player tried to pull up and the UK player took a little contact and flopped like Shane Battier used to.

The rule sited by cshs81 I would say that if the ref saw it that way it wasn't a foul.

 

UK lost get over it, The play call was weak anyway, maybe if they played Friday night the ref would have called it.

It wasn't a foul because they didn't call it a foul.

 

 

The UG player tried to pull up and the UK player took a little contact and flopped like Shane Battier used to.

The rule sited by cshs81 I would say that if the ref saw it that way it wasn't a foul.

 

UK lost get over it, The play call was weak anyway, maybe if they played Friday night the ref would have called it.

 

The bolded statment makes ZERO sense.

Here is a video of the play. Now if you can tell me with certainty that the defender a)saw the screen and b)had time to stop then the ref blew the call. Otherwise, it was the right call.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnZOOGCGr38

The bolded statment makes ZERO sense.

 

Well let me explain I think Gilliespe called the play to get a foul which I think is a bush league move. Therefor I said the play call was weak.

 

The other comment is about all the crying from another thread about how UK would have won on friday night. With sarcasm I said maybe if they played on Friday the ref would have called the foul as some believe these 2 factors are why UK lost.

 

Is that better.

I think that the video shows 2 things that support a no call. Once he sees the screener

1. he pulls up and 2. He tries to step in front of the screener.

Calling a play that gives your team a chance to win is bush league? Give me a break. It was about the only play call that could be made that would have given UK a chance. We must have been watching different plays if you saw him trying to pull up. Heck he even thought it was a foul. I listened to the game on my way back from Georgia on the Georgia network and the announcers were as homer as you get and they even said they missed the call.

Calling a play that gives your team a chance to win is bush league? Give me a break. It was about the only play call that could be made that would have given UK a chance. We must have been watching different plays if you saw him trying to pull up. Heck he even thought it was a foul. I listened to the game on my way back from Georgia on the Georgia network and the announcers were as homer as you get and they even said they missed the call.

 

:thumb: