December 13, 200718 yr He won't because he's not a horse's rear end like Bonds is. IMO, they're on the same level as players. People who "cheated" to gain an advantage. However, they're not even close on the "good guy" meter... They're not close on the meter, but only because Barry Bonds is so far off the meter you can't find his reading. Roger Clemens is a hated guy in many circles, and not someone I've ever particularly liked. He's basically a mercenary for one.
December 13, 200718 yr Now lets see if he is going to get the same treatment that Bonds has got... Whether it happens or not, there is going to be a lot of outcry for such treatment. But sticky is right, Bonds is just a jerk to anyone that approaches him, even before the 'roids. And the fact he was chasing the most important number in sports was too much to handle for most.
December 13, 200718 yr He gave Clemmons 5 shots in the rear. There are many more to come that haven't been listed.
December 13, 200718 yr Whether it happens or not, there is going to be a lot of outcry for such treatment. But sticky is right, Bonds is just a jerk to anyone that approaches him, even before the 'roids. And the fact he was chasing the most important number in sports was too much to handle for most. I understand that he may be a jerk towards some people but it doesnt take away from what he does on the field. If the " Rocket" doesnt get punished then Bonds shouldnt. There seems to be no more evidence on Bonds than there is on Clemens....
December 13, 200718 yr I understand that he may be a jerk towards some people but it doesnt take away from what he does on the field. If the " Rocket" doesnt get punished then Bonds shouldnt. There seems to be no more evidence on Bonds than there is on Clemens.... Well, except for that little perjury thing...
December 13, 200718 yr Well, except for that little perjury thing... Its one persons word against another....
December 13, 200718 yr Its one persons word against another.... It's Barry's word against the BALCO records of his urine tests. :lol:
December 14, 200718 yr Saw this at school today, are they saying the stuff Clemens took was Wind Straw, also known as winnie?
December 14, 200718 yr Yahoo! said there are "seven MVPs and 31 All-Stars — one for every position". Out of curiousity, anyone feel like computing that All-Star Steroids team?
December 14, 200718 yr How this happened are in the details. The problem right now with all the denials from agents, players and lawyers is the history of these special reports, they are virtually solid in its evidence presentation and documentation. Anyone who would think George Mitchell would advance a position without a complete support of evidence does not know the history of this person at all. Selig was very smart to appoint Sen. Mitchell to investigate and report. I am willing to bet many an exit strategy is already being discussed by players to reduce the damage/impact this will have.
December 14, 200718 yr The big thing the are focusing on is throwing the book at anybody that does it from here on out. I don't think a whole lot is going to be done (if anything) to the guys that got busted. I think there are WAY more guys that they haven't called out yet. The only thing that might happen to the guys that got busted is keeping them out of the Hall of Fame. There records won't be dropped etc IMO.
December 14, 200718 yr I doubt we will see anybody taking Mitchell to court. If he put it in his report, you can bet he can prove it.
December 14, 200718 yr The Trentonian (the paper in New Jersey that acts like it's the NY Post) had a great headline regarding Clemens this morning. And I can't display it here. Guru would probably ban me, and the board's Republicans would vilify me. (I will admit that I consider that last item to be a high honor, coming from them. :lol: ) But if you want to Google it on your own (or look for it over at The Deadspin), I certainly won't stop you.
December 15, 200718 yr The Trentonian (the paper in New Jersey that acts like it's the NY Post) had a great headline regarding Clemens this morning. And I can't display it here. Guru would probably ban me, and the board's Republicans would vilify me. (I will admit that I consider that last item to be a high honor, coming from them. :lol: ) But if you want to Google it on your own (or look for it over at The Deadspin), I certainly won't stop you. To quote one of our erstwhile mods, "Oh, my!"
December 15, 200718 yr To quote one of our erstwhile mods, "Oh, my!" Exactly! :jump: Completely accurate headline, in terms of what the Mitchell report says. But still ... I won't be posting it here. :lol:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.