1	Highlands	5A	6	3	-	1			4	.79453	1.65767	1.56661	1.32825
2	South Warren	5A	2	4	-	0			4	1.07501	.90044	1.30944	1.08424
3	North Laurel	5A	8	2	-	2			4	.52118	1.69900	1.00869	1.07967
4	Scott County	5A	5	3	-	1			4	.77118	1.20292	1.08338	1.01595
5	Greenwood	5A	2	3	-	1			4	.68472	1.55000	.74091	1.00442
6	South Oldham	5A	5	3	-	1			4	.68472	1.15590	1.18544	.99985
7	Collins	5A	5	3	-	1			4	.80869	.80367	1.32125	.96070
8	Southwestern	5A	8	1	-	2			3	.33333	1.53611	.97465	.94670
9	Cooper	5A	6	3	-	1			4	.82501	.55308	1.51725	.93751
10	Conner	5A	6	3	-	1			4	.82501	.51225	1.48745	.91428
11	Dixie Heights	5A	6	1	-	3			4	.25000	1.33382	1.13936	.89614
12	Moore	5A	4	3	-	0			3	.82807	.86522	.97250	.88440
13	Bowling Green	5A	2	2	-	2			4	.50000	.69933	1.47443	.86209
14	Atherton	5A	3	3	-	1			4	.71206	.92383	.94139	.85498
15	West Jessamine	5A	7	2	-	2			4	.42456	1.07208	1.09783	.85317
16	Graves County	5A	1	2	-	2			4	.41440	1.08698	1.06665	.84548
17	Madison Southern	5A	7	1	-	3			4	.28751	1.24375	.95582	.82269
18	East Jessamine	5A	7	0	-	3			3	.00000	1.57689	.66740	.75213
19	Woodford County	5A	5	2	-	1			3	.66667	.68420	.92345	.74984
20	Owensboro	5A	1	1	-	3			4	.28751	1.16733	.80212	.74983
21	North Bullitt	5A	4	2	-	2			4	.50000	.72067	1.02497	.73472
22	Grayson County	5A	4	3	-	1			4	.61576	.75175	.85325	.73460
23	Madisonville-North Hopkins	5A	1	3	-	1			4	.56064	.76050	.84956	.71726
24	Pulaski County	5A	8	1	-	3			4	.20720	1.00500	.96240	.71299
25	Marshall County	5A	1	1	-	3			4	.25000	.96858	.93800	.70790
26	Boone County	5A	6	1	-	2			3	.31157	.93522	.83356	.68644
27	Apollo	5A	1	0	-	4			4	.00000	1.29408	.76502	.68244
28	Muhlenberg County	5A	1	3	-	1			4	.61089	.55900	.88221	.67413
29	Anderson County	5A	5	0	-	3			3	.00000	1.41133	.48503	.63947
30	Bullitt Central	5A	4	1	-	3			4	.18904	.78475	.97150	.63228
31	Fairdale	5A	3	1	-	3			4	.21952	.63608	1.10893	.63214
32	South Laurel	5A	8	3	-	1			4	.65640	.33850	.91967	.62412
33	Ohio County	5A	2	0	-	4			4	.00000	1.03742	.85866	.62069
34	Butler	5A	3	0	-	4			4	.00000	.74692	1.18471	.61683
35	Seneca	5A	4	2	-	1			3	.53077	.29556	1.07305	.61113
36	Montgomery County	5A	7	2	-	2			4	.40856	.47650	.87975	.57370
37	Scott	5A	6	1	-	3			4	.23368	.31950	1.04618	.50747
38	Iroquois	5A	3	0	-	4			4	.00000	.57217	.93446	.48060
39	Harlan County	5A	8	0	-	4			4	.00000	.81500	.58719	.46141

Bump.

This may be the most wide open class.  No great Defense in the west.  I would guess Highlands vs BG right now.  Wouldn’t be shocked if both are upset though.

If Highlands stays at #1 in the Rpi, does that give them home field all the way until the finals? 

5 hours ago, Brown said:

This may be the most wide open class.  No great Defense in the west.  I would guess Highlands vs BG right now.  Wouldn’t be shocked if both are upset though.

South Warren will give BG a run.

1 hour ago, Royal Blue said:

If Highlands stays at #1 in the Rpi, does that give them home field all the way until the finals? 

I believe so,  yes. 

? KHSAA 5A RPI - Week 7

khsaa.org/rpi_details 

Thanks for posting the RPI. It's like every thing else in my life. I don't know anything about it, but it can't be too bad with Highlands number one. ☺️  Go Birds!!!

I see some familiar faces on the chain gang at HHS home games. Some are believed to be former Highlands football players. If I'm right they all played the same position. Glad to see immediate family members still supporting the program. If I'm not mistaken they have more more rings than most jewelry stores. (JK).

 

5️⃣ 5A RPI updated for Week 7 ~

Top 10 - 

Lots of high powered offensive output, with winners and losers scoring 50+ points last week.

Highlands 58 Cooper 51

Bowling Green 57 Ohio Co. 0

Scott Co. 56 Collins 26

Owensboro 61 Apollo 21

• And that means for RPI purposes ... absolutely nothing. But it was kinda exciting wasn't it? 

Position changes from last week:

2. Southwestern; +4

4. Scott Co.; +4 

5. Greenwood; +2

6. South Oldham; -1

7. North Laurel; -3

8. Bowling Green; -6

9. Owensboro; +1  

Newcomer +

10. Collins; +2

Dropped out - 

13. Cooper; - 6

? khsaa.org/rpi_details

I’m confused why did BG drop so much and GW improve?

14 minutes ago, Devils Fan said:

I’m confused why did BG drop so much and GW improve?

My thought is:

- For BG - you added Ohio County's 6th from the bottom .57145 and 1 win resume to the mix.

- For GW - you add South Warren's 3rd from the top 1.111 resume to the mix.

 

Look for both BG and GW to go down again this week regardless of score as they add Christian County and Ohio County, respectively.

Whoever wins the BG vs South game will get a BIG RPI and District boost with that win.  And the BG vs GW winner too.

45 minutes ago, Devils Fan said:

I’m confused why did BG drop so much and GW improve?

Cause it's such a terrible rating system. 

@Purple88 so GW loses to SW (the number 3 team) and goes plus 2. Cooper loses to Highlands(the number 1 team) and goes minus 6… This system is a little tricky. 

Head to Head doesn't matter as much as the total body of work for all opponents, and even the opponents opponents. 

45 minutes ago, BLUEHOUND said:

Head to Head doesn't matter as much as the total body of work for all opponents, and even the opponents opponents. 

 

1 hour ago, Devils Fan said:

@Purple88 so GW loses to SW (the number 3 team) and goes plus 2. Cooper loses to Highlands(the number 1 team) and goes minus 6… This system is a little tricky. 

What @BLUEHOUND said.  Greenwood adds South's RPI strength to the mix, but also South's opponents strength to the mix.  That includes Manual, Southwestern and Henderson County who all have favorable RPI numbers.

I assume the same is true for Cooper as well.  Remembering they also lost (as you said).