December 4, 200619 yr So you're advocating voting the teams in your conference higher than you really think they are simply because they're in your conference? Thats MUCH worse than UF jumping UM for the #2 spot. I'm not advocating anything. I'm just saying that among coaching ranks, that's the general rule. They do it, because other coaches do it. Which is why coaches shouldn't have this much say in such a decision. Right? No.
December 4, 200619 yr I'm not advocating anything. I'm just saying that among coaching ranks, that's the general rule. They do it, because other coaches do it. Which is why coaches shouldn't have this much say in such a decision. Right? No. The bottom line is there are only 12 coaches in the SEC and thats not enough power to unseat UM from the #2 spot. Get off your conspiracy thoery, admit that UF has AT LEAST as good an argument as Michigan, and that one of the two gets left out. Just so happens to be Michigan. It happened to LSU and Arkansas before.
December 4, 200619 yr Did all Big Ten Coaches vote UM #2? NO Sorry, Ron Zook still thinks he's at Florida.
December 4, 200619 yr Playoff system. Would solve all of this. Lloyd prob didnt get his boys in because he didn't campaign as hard as Urban did.
December 4, 200619 yr I HONESTLY can not understand why it's bogus for a team's ranking to improve after beating a top ranked team on a neutral field. Makes absolutely no sense to me. What I don't get is how a 10 point win over a two loss team on a neutral field is more impressive than a 3 point loss to the unanimous #1 on the road.
December 4, 200619 yr What I don't get is how a 10 point win over a two loss team on a neutral field is more impressive than a 3 point loss to the unanimous #1 on the road. Boy that sure is a weak argument.
December 5, 200619 yr The rankings didn't meat squat until this vote. If that's not the case, please explain. If it doesn't "meat squat" why do they have them before this week?
December 5, 200619 yr Sums it up. If OSU had lost to UM, I would have been fine with them in the Rose Bowl. If UM gets beat by USC were they "right"? What about it UF beats OSU? A home loss should've eliminated them from NC consideration...
December 5, 200619 yr If it doesn't "meat squat" why do they have them before this week? Why does Lunardi do a Bracketology for the next season right after the tourney?
December 5, 200619 yr Why does Lunardi do a Bracketology for the next season right after the tourney? Because he's bored... Does that Bracketology have anything to do with the actual National Championship and who attends?
December 5, 200619 yr This has been a great thread, but I am a bit puzzled: What exactly is a "meat squat?"
December 5, 200619 yr This has been a great thread, but I am a bit puzzled: What exactly is a "meat squat?" Maybe you're not as educated as we thought... :lol: :lol:
December 5, 200619 yr I do understand GT being upset considering hes a Michigan fan. But I dont understand why everyone is so upset over Florida winning their conference and going 12-1. Michigan didn't win their conference and went 11-1. If Im not mistaken Florida has played just as tough of a schedule, probably a little tougher. You guys can cry about if for months, the fact is Florida got in and its over now.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.