How does it make anyone blind when I still have yet to see one post taking up for or defending any of the democrats anywhere? Or am I just missing where people have been defending democrats?

 

PP92 I am talking about the Ds who are corrupt. I say the same about the Rs that are corrupt. The DNC was caught red handed helping Hillary beat Bernie and red handed causing the alot of the issues at the Trump rallies. Maxine Waters says Trump should not have fired Comey but would have been ok if Hillary did. Politics has become so messed up its gonna destroy us and we cant keep supporting people just because they are either a R or a D. We need good people to help all people. Thats my stance and I get really frustrated when people take sides that cant be proven. There is so much misinformation now that its hard to decipher.

What does all of this have to do with my question above about your post #122? Can you answer for me what the issue is that you saw in what you posted in post #122?

 

Sorry if I don't fall into any convenient labels. I am open minded. And believe it or not, Hillary Clinton is the only Democrat I voted for last fall. Every other candidate I voted for was Republican. Maybe that is weird and hard to understand, but it is the truth.

 

The way I have heard it is there is an FBI investigation of Russian intervention in last year's election and it includes possible connections to the Trump campaign. That investigation started last July. Is that accurate?

 

Several posters have asked for a link or proof that Trump is under investigation. Please provide it or lets move on. Its really that simple. You are going on speculation.

 

As for your leanings, call yourself what you want. I can say that I am a Democrat, but I would be lying. Just saying.

What does all of this have to do with my question above about your post #122? Can you answer for me what the issue is that you saw in what you posted in post #122?

 

Sorry if I don't fall into any convenient labels. I am open minded. And believe it or not, Hillary Clinton is the only Democrat I voted for last fall. Every other candidate I voted for was Republican. Maybe that is weird and hard to understand, but it is the truth.

 

The way I have heard it is there is an FBI investigation of Russian intervention in last year's election and it includes possible connections to the Trump campaign. That investigation started last July. Is that accurate?

 

If that picture I provided about Clinton and Podesta needs me to explain whats wrong then I am done with this because you are not gonna get it.

I think we're playing a semantics game when arguing if the FBI is investigating President Trump.

 

We know they are investigating links between campaign associates and Russia. Do we all agree on that?

 

If so you cannot uncouple the President from the investigation unless you truly believe he had no knowledge much less influence on his campaign aides' actions.

PP92 I am talking about the Ds who are corrupt. I say the same about the Rs that are corrupt. The DNC was caught red handed helping Hillary beat Bernie and red handed causing the alot of the issues at the Trump rallies. Maxine Waters says Trump should not have fired Comey but would have been ok if Hillary did. Politics has become so messed up its gonna destroy us and we cant keep supporting people just because they are either a R or a D. We need good people to help all people. Thats my stance and I get really frustrated when people take sides that cant be proven. There is so much misinformation now that its hard to decipher.

 

Okay. I needed some clarification. I haven't seen anyone defending anything the democrats have done and I've been pretty clear on how I feel about the democrats right now as well.

I think we're playing a semantics game when arguing if the FBI is investigating President Trump.

 

We know they are investigating links between campaign associates and Russia. Do we all agree on that?

 

If so you cannot uncouple the President from the investigation unless you truly believe he had no knowledge much less influence on his campaign aides' actions.

 

Amen, bro!!!

Okay. I needed some clarification. I haven't seen anyone defending anything the democrats have done and I've been pretty clear on how I feel about the democrats right now as well.

 

I am amazed at how often DNC and Bernie Sanders get mentioned in threads about Russia and the President.

No it wouldn't.

 

What are you saying?

Several posters have asked for a link or proof that Trump is under investigation. Please provide it or lets move on. Its really that simple. You are going on speculation.

 

As for your leanings, call yourself what you want. I can say that I am a Democrat, but I would be lying. Just saying.

 

I think we're playing a semantics game when arguing if the FBI is investigating President Trump.

 

We know they are investigating links between campaign associates and Russia. Do we all agree on that?

 

If so you cannot uncouple the President from the investigation unless you truly believe he had no knowledge much less influence on his campaign aides' actions.

 

Thank you Clyde.

I am amazed at how often DNC and Bernie Sanders get mentioned in threads about Russia and the President.

 

Same here. Sigh.....

I think we're playing a semantics game when arguing if the FBI is investigating President Trump.

 

We know they are investigating links between campaign associates and Russia. Do we all agree on that?

 

If so you cannot uncouple the President from the investigation unless you truly believe he had no knowledge much less influence on his campaign aides' actions.

 

Which opens up an entirely different can of worms. There's a certain amount of cognitive dissonance necessary to truly stick up for what's going on. And frankly there isn't that Hilary would be worse baseline so many still somehow lean on. There's no more election. Trump is the president, it's ok to have voted for him and still think there are huge issues going on right now.

If that picture I provided about Clinton and Podesta needs me to explain whats wrong then I am done with this because you are not gonna get it.

 

Well, you won't answer what the issue is (:wideyed:), so I will go ahead and tell you what I see in that post.

 

I see Hillary Clinton's political team working on a strategy in support of their candidate. I see them spinning the story in favor of their candidate for the media. No different than what Bannon and Kelly Anne did and do for Trump.

 

Since you won't tell us what you see as an issue, I will take a guess. I am going to guess you are reading that to say Podesta et al created the Russian intervention in the election. If that is the issue you see, you are wrong because the fact is the FBI started their Russian investigation 4 months before election day.

I think we're playing a semantics game when arguing if the FBI is investigating President Trump.

 

We know they are investigating links between campaign associates and Russia. Do we all agree on that?

 

If so you cannot uncouple the President from the investigation unless you truly believe he had no knowledge much less influence on his campaign aides' actions.

 

Which is why some are evidently drawing parallels to Nixon/Watergate.

I think we're playing a semantics game when arguing if the FBI is investigating President Trump.

 

We know they are investigating links between campaign associates and Russia. Do we all agree on that?

 

If so you cannot uncouple the President from the investigation unless you truly believe he had no knowledge much less influence on his campaign aides' actions.

 

I would probably go with "alleged links."

Which is why some are evidently drawing parallels to Nixon/Watergate.

 

Which strikes me as way over the top at this point.