Your definition of proof and mine are obviously different.

 

What do you think he meant today when he told Lester Holt that when he decided to fire Comey he was considering "this Russia thing?"

Waste of time to even debate this. Immaterial to the subject at hand. It's obvious that too many do this. Not news.

 

You're sounding a whole lot like President Trump deciding what merits debate and all.

 

It's obvious that the Dems are fanning the flames to keep their base outraged, facts be damned. That merits debate.

 

Just a few months ago Schumer was pushing for his firing and basically said Comey was incompetent. Now that's its politically expedient he cries foul. I'd say that demands discussion.

You're sounding a whole lot like President Trump deciding what merits debate and all.

 

It's obvious that the Dems are fanning the flames to keep their base outraged, facts be damned. That merits debate.

 

Just a few months ago Schumer was pushing for his firing and basically said Comey was incompetent. Now that's its politically expedient he cries foul. I'd say that demands discussion.

 

Fanning flames? Heck even Rs in Congress are unhappy with his actions.

 

To your initial point - switching your argument based on your political persuasion - it's old news. It's not new. Why waste time re-stating what we all know?

What do you think he meant today when he told Lester Holt that when he decided to fire Comey he was considering "this Russia thing?"

 

I'm thinking that the "Russia thing" will continue.

 

I'm thinking that the President acted completely within his power and purview.

 

I'm thinking that Putin is laughing his behind off that the left is now carrying his water.

I'm thinking that the "Russia thing" will continue.

 

I'm thinking that the President acted completely within his power and purview.

 

I'm thinking that Putin is laughing his behind off that the left is now carrying his water.

 

Great but you didn't answer the question.

Fanning flames? Heck even Rs in Congress are unhappy with his actions.

 

To your initial point - switching your argument based on your political persuasion - it's old news. It's not new. Why waste time re-stating what we all know?

 

Then this whole thread is irrelevant because a few moths ago the roles were reversed. The Dems wanted to show Comey the door. Switched their position based on political expediencey, old news not worthy of discussion.

Then this whole thread is irrelevant because a few moths ago the roles were reversed. The Dems wanted to show Comey the door. Switched their position based on political expediencey, old news not worthy of discussion.

 

Incorrect. This thread is not about him being fired. The thread is about the REASON he was fired.

Great but you didn't answer the question.

 

Didn't see the entire interview nor the context he said it in so I really don't know. But if he was using poli-speak that's old news. They all do it. Old news. Not worthy of discussion.

Didn't see the entire interview .

 

Type "Trump Lester Holt Russia" into your Google machine.

Incorrect. This thread is not about him being fired. The thread is about the REASON he was fired.

 

No the title of the thread is

The firing of FBI Director James Comey - What is each side saying?

 

Each side is saying what is politically expedient for them and as you stated old news, not worthy of discussion.

No the title of the thread is

 

Each side is saying what is politically expedient for them and as you stated old news, not worthy of discussion.

 

The thread left that arena a long time ago.

The thread left that arena a long time ago.

 

Then maybe we need to take it back where it was. The left would be outraged if Trump found a cure for cancer, probably citing the number of healthcare workers who will lose their jobs as a result. It's no shock that they are "outraged" over this. It's all political circus and I've seen no "facts" that make me feel otherwise.

Then maybe we need to take it back where it was. The left would be outraged if Trump found a cure for cancer, probably citing the number of healthcare workers who will lose their jobs as a result. It's no shock that they are "outraged" over this. It's all political circus and I've seen no "facts" that make me feel otherwise.

 

What would you need to see to be outraged?

What would you need to see to be outraged?

 

Nothing because it would just be fake news from the left. Trump could go to jail or flee the country and seek asylum in Russia and it would be fake news.

Yeah. The "suspect at best" are what we're debating.

 

He didn't get fired for "legitimate" reasons.

Does he need a reason?