You left out the part about Don the clown having access to nuclear launch codes.

 

Wow you all have reached a new level of weakness if that's all you have.

 

I'll cut some slack though that's two days in a row that someone vaporized any and every pro Hillary thread ever posted on here.

Wow you all have reached a new level of weakness if that's all you have.

 

I'll cut some slack though that's two days in a row that someone vaporized any and every pro Hillary thread ever posted on here.

Oh no, I have much more. Always best, though, to disseminate info in small bites.

Speculation ain't proof.

 

However we have some pretty strong proof Big D is all three listed.

 

I'm naive :jump:

 

There is plenty of documented 'proof' of mis-deeds, lying and corruption in many, if not most or all of the major 'scandals'.

 

Whitewater - associates went to jail involving the dealings (and were pardoned by Bill).

Travelgate - documented statements from investigators that they were lied to directly by HRC.

Benghazi - participation in a ruse about a video when it was know - from the start - that it was organized, targeted attack.

Clinton Foundation disclosure - multiple cases where sources, especially foreign sources, were not disclosed as required by the agreement established to allow HRC to be SoS.

Emailgate - Specific Federal regulations and laws were not followed.

 

Potential charges from the known facts concerning the above above include obstruction of justice, contempt of Congress and basic breaking of Federal laws.

 

Lack of formal indictments by prosecutors and the AG, who have discretion to not pursue prosecution for what ever reason - including purely political - does not change open facts into 'speculation'.

There are obviously alot of racist, bigoted Americans who like Trump according to you guys. Seems he did something you and others on here said he could not. Win the nomination. You all laughed at the thought. How many votes did he get? He closed out 16 others quicker than the Felon Hillary. Donald is a loud mouth. Hillary is a crook and liar. Who will you vote for?

 

Gary Johnson. The fact that Trump won the nomination is funny and sad at the same time and tells us all a lot about all of us when you look at the things he has said to get in the position he is in.

Let me put it to you straight. Think about a time when you felt you really let yourself down. You did something that you knew deep down was wrong but you did it anyway. You put your self-respect in jeopardy and it took a hit. You know what a terrible feeling it is. I don't want this to happen to you Trumpeteers. I don't want you to hate yourself the morning after the election. I want you to be able to still respect yourself when you wake up Wednesday morning.

 

You have other options now besides the most unqualified human being to ever vie for the presidency. The Libertarian Party has a solid ticket of fiscal conservatives with tons of executive experience. You may even have another conservative option. If principle really matters to you, you can vote your conscience and principle and salvage your self-respect.

 

One of our friends on here was criticized awhile back for being willing to "waste" his vote on Gary Johnson, instead of voting for someone who could actually win. He responded with a rather profound statement to the effect that he could vote for Johnson and still maintain his self-respect and so how is that a waste. I agree.

 

At this point in time , I can still vote for either Clinton or Johnson and still go to sleep with the knowledge that I voted for someone who is capable of doing this job. Johnson I believe is a principled man with executive experience and Hillary is more than capable of holding her own with the toughest leaders of the world and she has the experience and qualifications that the job requires. At this point she has not been convicted of anything. Not one. If she is found guilty of serious crimes, then I will look even closer than I am already looking at the Johnson / Weld ticket. Moderate fiscal policy and liberal social agenda isn't exactly unappealing to me.

 

The only person I simply could not vote for and salvage my self-respect would be this Trump clown. I don't have to tell you that this carnival barker is totally and foolishly unqualified to be this country's chief executive.

I understand if you don't like Hillary or if you think she's too dishonest to be President. Hell, all politicians are dishonest. You really think Trump is any more honest than Hillary? The point is, you are not saddled with just this celebrity apprentice chump. You have other options- pretty darn good options at that. I want you to still respect yourself when you wake up the morning after the election. Hillary's the most qualified to be President but if you can't put your unabashed hatred for the Clinton's aside, cast your vote for Gary Johnson or this French fellow if he enters the race. Look at it this way. Regardless, you're going to be on the losing end but at least you will still respect yourself and you won't regret your vote two decades from now. My dad still regrets his vote for Nixon 56 years ago. Don't regret yours fifty years from now. Be able to look at your little children with tears in your eyes, knowing your vote was one based on principle and conscience and not on misplaced hatred of one woman.

 

Explain why a vote for Donald Trump is better than Gary Johnson. I can give you a thousand reasons why he's not. I mean, Trump is likely to win KY regardless of your vote. So, why not vote for the man you know is more qualified? Who knows, I may very well vote for him as well. You'll sleep better...

 

Okay

Gary Johnson. The fact that Trump won the nomination is funny and sad at the same time and tells us all a lot about all of us when you look at the things he has said to get in the position he is in.

 

I concur. Both funny and sad. More sad than funny.

Is it racist when a black defendant questions the ability to get a fair trial before a white judge?

 

Good question. Is the black dude running for president? Folks running for president are held to a higher standard and should know better than to make inflammatory statements in the press. If it is just a regular black dude then I guess we'd have to look at the background of the judge the same way the Mexican-American judge's background was looked in to and then his politics can be blamed for the black guy's belief of the inability to get a fair trial from the white judge. Also, does the black dude have a history of things he is currently charged for? That makes a difference as well.

Speculation ain't proof.

 

However we have some pretty strong proof Big D is all three listed.

 

I'm naive :jump:

 

Come on, it's just common sense. How could those fees possibly be reasonably justified?

 

It will be a huge mistake if our country elects someone with the moral compass of Hillary Clinton, and it would be an embarrassment to elect Trump.

 

Third Party looks like the best option to me, although I do not agree with a lot of the platform of the Libertarian Party, Gary Johnson seems to be a better human being and much less crooked than my other two choices.

Come on, it's just common sense. How could those fees possibly be reasonably justified?

 

It will be a huge mistake if our country elects someone with the moral compass of Hillary Clinton, and it would be an embarrassment to elect Trump.

 

Third Party looks like the best option to me, although I do not agree with a lot of the platform of the Libertarian Party, Gary Johnson seems to be a better human being and much less crooked than my other two choices.

 

Common sense has put many of an innocent man on death row.

 

I conceded Hillary has lied and has been involved in unproven scandals, but Trump is a proven fraud, a proven liar, and a proven racist.

 

You people said he couldn't out-sleaze HRC. I think he did.

Common sense has put many of an innocent man on death row.

 

I conceded Hillary has lied and has been involved in unproven scandals, but Trump is a proven fraud, a proven liar, and a proven racist.

 

You people said he couldn't out-sleaze HRC. I think he did.

 

In my view, he is sleazier.

^^^

 

Trump chummin' around with Don King and Al Sharpton. That certainly changes my view of him. Maybe we do need him as President.

^^^ Talk about a non-sequitur. Got any photo boards of the Don hugging any Mexican-Americans? I didn't think so.

[ATTACH]56366[/ATTACH]

 

However he also was not under a microscope and did not give as many speeches and press conferences.

I conceded Hillary has lied and has been involved in unproven scandals, but Trump is a proven fraud, a proven liar, and a proven racist.

 

You people said he couldn't out-sleaze HRC. I think he did.

 

Exact same can be said about the Clintons,

Fraud: Clinton Foundation

Liar: Where to start?

Racist: Bill charged with telling Arkansas Troopers to pull over all Hispanics when he was Gov., Hillary mocking Blacks in a southern church by trying to "Talk" like she thinks they do and later talking about being afraid of young black men in hoodies (I guess she would have shot Trayvon too)