September 23, 201312 yr The Dalton fumble was not his fault IMO. He got killed twice on the same play. Not many would've held on to the ball there. That one was on the O-line. ??????????? You shouldn't drink this early in the morning.
September 23, 201312 yr Great effort by the D and Marvin finally wins a huge challenge that directly leads to the team winning the game.
September 23, 201312 yr How many teams will try to run the ball against this D this year on 3rd or 4th and 1? I wouldn't advise doing that.
September 23, 201312 yr ?? He has to have better ball security than that. He tried to stretch a play and minimize the lost yardage from the sack and didn't put the ball away. That's like saying that BJGE's fumble wasn't his fault. Dalton has to learn to either throw it away or take the sack. His ability not to do that led to two turnovers. If your going to throw the ball to AJ in tight man to man why not let him go up to get it?
September 23, 201312 yr Great effort by the D and Marvin finally wins a huge challenge that directly leads to the team winning the game. Actually back to back weeks. The fumble in the PITT game was a turning point as well. I joked with a buddy that I don't remember Marvin winning a challenge the entire time we had season tickets and now he did it back to back weeks. Amazing.
September 23, 201312 yr Seemed as if there were quite a few Packers' fans in attendance. They're like Steelers fans: everywhere. Tons of them at every game.
September 23, 201312 yr what are you talking about?You said the exact same thing I've said for awhile now about DB's If you don't have a good D-Line to get pressure on the QB your passing defense will not be very good. That is what you just said in the other post and now that you realize you said the same thing I said you are now backpedaling? Why? Just admit that the D-liine is a direct aspect to your passing defense. I have said that and agree the D-line is a direct aspect. What I don't get is how you can seriously say the defensive backs in 2005 was better. They finished 27th against the pass, couldn't play much man because they couldn't cover anyone man to man. When they did play man they had to play 10 yards off and gave up passes all day. Your to smart to seriously act like getting interceptions shows that someone is better. Those DB's when they did get interceptions were getting flat out beat, and was not like the QB sat there waiting all day, it usually still happened fast. Just like there is a reason why 3 of the 4 starting DB's didn't make it in the league after the next season. If those DB's in 2005 had this defensive front, this defensive front wouldn't look good because of how far back the DB's had to play because they were not capable of playing close tight man. How many times did we see that year a 3rd and 8 and them still playing 10 yards off and allowing a slant go for the first down? Those corners were great at capatlizing on mistake throws but sucked at the other aspects of it. Now they probably wouldn't have finished 27th against the pass if they had this d-line but still wouldn't finish in top 10 and definitely would not have held QB's to under 300 yards passing in 17 straight games.
September 23, 201312 yr Turning point of the game, in papa's opinion, was the 15-yard penalty on the XP that put the Pack up 16. Follow that with another 15-yarder for a late hit a few plays into the Bengals' next possession and the momentum had swung. My distinct pleasure meeting Swamprat at the name. I get to cross another BGP stalwart off my bucket list.:thumb:
September 23, 201312 yr I have said that and agree the D-line is a direct aspect. What I don't get is how you can seriously say the defensive backs in 2005 was better. They finished 27th against the pass, You just contradicted yourself in those 2 sentences. It's easy to say the CB's were better in 2005. 1 was a pro bowler, the other had more than double the int's that Leon Hall had last season. It's not that difficult.
September 23, 201312 yr You just contradicted yourself in those 2 sentences. It's easy to say the CB's were better in 2005. 1 was a pro bowler, the other had more than double the int's that Leon Hall had last season. It's not that difficult. There wasn't a single corner on that team with the same ability of Leon Hall. INT is a misleading stat with DB's. How often were they thrown at? A lot of factors. The depth at CB is much greater this year as well. This defense as a whole is so much better than 2005's I wouldn't want to trade a thing from that year to replace on this team.
September 23, 201312 yr They're like Steelers fans: everywhere. Tons of them at every game. Ridiculous that they had to buy Jets seats or deal with a scalper in order to go. Wonder how low attendance would have been without the Cheese.......
September 23, 201312 yr One mistake can cost you dearly in the NFL: Green Bay Packers cut Jeremy Ross after fumble vs. Cincinnati Bengals - ESPN
September 23, 201312 yr One mistake can cost you dearly in the NFL: Green Bay Packers cut Jeremy Ross after fumble vs. Cincinnati Bengals - ESPN He also fumbled a punt last year in the NFC playoffs against the 49ers and has one catch in 2 seasons. Probably the last straw yesterday.
September 24, 201312 yr You just contradicted yourself in those 2e sentences. It's easy to say the CB's were better in 2005. 1 was a pro bowler, the other had more than double the int's that Leon Hall had last season. It's not that difficult. Your better than that man if you think more interceptions means someone is a better corner. Even though we disagree a lot because of your always negative outlook I do see you as a pretty knowledgeable sports fan. So come on man. Those guys couldn't defend well at all that's why they had to play a lot of zone and off coverage man. They gave up tons of yards and completions majority of games. However bypplaying zone and off man it did allow them to try to read the quarterback and jump routes. Which is why you always seepeople who play zone and off man get more interceptions. In bump and run man which the Bengals do now you don't get much chance to jump routes and make plays on a ball.O'Neal was a pro bowler because he got a lot of picks by doing this even though the majority of the plays besides the picks he got burnt. However in the league there are two ways to make pro bowl. Even have a reputation for being a shut down corner or get a lot of picks that make you stand out.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.