March 10, 201214 yr But they can give you Kansas or Missouri in Atlanta and that is fine also? Correct?
March 10, 201214 yr So as long as they give you Michigan State, Ohio State or Duke in St. Louis you'll be fine? Absolutely.
March 10, 201214 yr But they can give you Kansas or Missouri in Atlanta and that is fine also? Correct? Once again, absolutely, if one of those teams is the worst # 2 seed.
March 10, 201214 yr Can they give you Duke or UNC in Atlanta? I don't think UNC would be the lowest rated # 2 seed.
March 10, 201214 yr Not in 2003 when both Wisconsin and Marquette were in the same region in the games played in Minneapolis. If they put them in St. Louis, and both Kansas and Missouri are in other regions then I'll have no problem. Where would you have put UK in '03? I guess you could argue two Midwestern teams should have been shipped elsewhere.
March 10, 201214 yr The UK pity party has started 26 hours before the selection show... :cry: :banana:
March 10, 201214 yr It was South. Yes, it was the South region. I just looked it up and Syracuse was in the West region. Baylor in Houston is a very tough draw. That is the sort of matchup, however, that should be given to the 4th number one seed if it has to be given to anyone, though, right? It's different saying "Oh, wow the three seed in my bracket is from the same region" as it is saying "The two seed from my bracket is from this region." Is it not? I mean that's the point at least I was trying to make -- that the number one overall seed should be rewarded by being given the most favorable tournament bracket. That just hasn't happened recently, and it would be a ridiculous break to give UK the Midwest bracket with Missouri in it.
March 10, 201214 yr I don't think UNC would be the lowest rated # 2 seed. Shouldn't be. I wouldn't think Kansas or Mizzou would be either. I'm thinking Michigan State or Ohio State. I have Duke just above Kansas and Mizzou as the top 3 two seeds.
March 10, 201214 yr I don't think UNC would be the lowest rated # 2 seed. 1-4 is all that is ranked in determinig brackets. As I said, in '10 the top two seeds had the top two #2s in their bracket.
March 10, 201214 yr The UK pity party has started 26 hours before the selection show... :cry: :banana: Facts are facts. The best #1 seed plays the worst #2 seed. I'm arguing that the best #1 seed is easily Kentucky. The worst #2 seed is easily not Missouri. Why would they end up in the same bracket in a favorable region for Missouri? I mean how is that a pity party?
March 10, 201214 yr The UK pity party has started 26 hours before the selection show... :cry: :banana: The longer the party, the more food you can consume.
March 10, 201214 yr The UK pity party has started 26 hours before the selection show... :cry: :banana: Welcome aboard! They have not even announced the brackets yet. Probably put UK in the play-in game.
March 10, 201214 yr 1-4 is all that is ranked in determinig brackets. As I said, in '10 the top two seeds had the top two #2s in their bracket. Then that is stupid, and not fair.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.