woodsrider

Seems like this gets said every year

It would be between Brohm and Kiffin for me and between those two I'd go with Brohm. Strong wouldn't even get sniff if I'm making the decision. Long and Day both are intriguing but I'd rather have Brohm.

Your right. UK's has all the advantages. That's why they've had all this success in my life time, oh wait... But what do I know, I'm obviously not as smart as you since Purdue has clear had no luck winning football games the last 20 years.

You've called opinions in here crazy, delusional, and absurd. I've not ignored one single thing you've said nor have I dismissed your opinion. Then you want to play the victim? Give me a break. I've provide facts why UK is no better than Purdue as a job and again you have to again act like only your opinion matters and no one could possible be a smart as you. And you wonder why people don't want to debate anything with you.

No reason to argue with someone that believes only their opinion matters.

Potential is great but eventually potential has to prove out. Fact is Purdue has better results over the long haul. That's not even debatable. It's simply facts. Purdue was a good program under Tiller. Kentucky has not been a good program under anyone in the last 20-30 years. They've had good years but no one has been able to have sustained success. Brooks is probably as close to it as we've had. You can say how wrong we are and our opinions are absurd but where to the statics point?

Because that's what I said, good lord. Can you not have a discussion without making crap up?

From 1997... Purdue 125-135 UK 107-147 Yeah, that's crazy. Go back further if you want, the story doesn't change.

He went 7-6, 4-5 last year and is currently 5-5, 4-3 and just got smoked by an awful Minnesota team. I agree you aren't going to win a title at Purdue but everyone is acting like Brohm is the hottest thing out there. I just don't see it. I don't see anyone putting Stoops in that same category and his resume at UK is similar. I would argue Purdue is easier to win than UK. Tiller had a nice run there.

If you are USC why would Brohm be at the top of you list? I just don't get the Brohm hype.

What opportunity? He's had what 4 or 5 possessions? Wilson has had 95% of the snaps and isn't getting better. I say you play Gunnar against Middle TN the whole game and see what you really have with him.

everybody says there isn't a better option but what other options have gotten a legit chance?

Over the last 5 weeks or so this team has steadily gotten worse each week.

This. He's really only had 1 season worthy of the the contract he is asking for. He's a good player but overrated in my opinion.

No, not unless one or more of the .500 teams lose this week.

LSU currenty has 7 wins over teams with .500 or better record. Wash ST has 6 and one of those is an FCS school. At best after this week they will be tied. if none of the .500 teams lose. LSU has wins over 3 top 25 teams. Washington St has 0. If that doesn't change after this week then why would the committee jump Washington St over LSU?

I don't disagree that WSU's win would be better but to believe they jump LSU you have to believe the committee thinks they are pretty close right now. The fact that they left LSU ahead of WSU after getting waxed by Bama speaks volumes in my mind. WSU just doesn't have any great wins. I just don't see why you would think the committee believes LSU is better this week but a win over a average at best Colorado would change their minds.

Because UMBC over Virginia isn't the point of the tournament. Neither is a Loyola to the F4.

Of course they are but what could WSU do to move past LSU if LSU beats Arkansas by 3 TDs?

I get that and normally I would have clicked this one off 2 mins in the second half...but Dukes big 3 keep me watching. Personally I think Barrett isn't getting enough praise if that's possible. All anyone can talk about is Zion and Barrett is just so freaking good. So smooth and got to the rim at will. Even when double teamed he just seemed to squeeze through cracks and hit tough shots.

Well, that first half felt like a long time

:lol2:Ok sure

I guess you’re adding Duke to your list of favorite teams..

No he didn’t. He’s just doing what he’s good at

So the NBA should be forced to take them?