Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Is Herman Cain Serious?

Featured Replies

Cool. Thanks. I caught the headline passing by a tv here at work but didn't get the details. Sounds like much ado about nothing.
Any sexual type harassment is something, but like me you are probably immune to this kind of stuff unless it is John Edwards type bad.
  • Replies 111
  • Views 9.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Any sexual type harassment is something, but like me you are probably immune to this kind of stuff unless it is John Edwards type bad.

 

I'm confused...how is sexual harrassment less bad than what John Edwards did? I mean, I think what he did was horrible, but it wasn't the sexual part that was bad, it was the infidelity...and honestly, maybe I'd have not even felt that the infidelity was that bad if not for Elizabeth Edwards' health condition. I'm just trying to get a grip on why sexually harrassing someone is less offensive to you than infidelity. And if Cain were married at the time, one could argue that the sexual harrassment WAS infidelity.

Any sexual type harassment is something, but like me you are probably immune to this kind of stuff unless it is John Edwards type bad.

 

True indeed.

I'm confused...how is sexual harrassment less bad than what John Edwards did? I mean, I think what he did was horrible, but it wasn't the sexual part that was bad, it was the infidelity...and honestly, maybe I'd have not even felt that the infidelity was that bad if not for Elizabeth Edwards' health condition. I'm just trying to get a grip on why sexually harrassing someone is less offensive to you than infidelity. And if Cain were married at the time, one could argue that the sexual harrassment WAS infidelity.

 

I don't think anyone is saying it is less bad just that it seems like there isn't a single person in DC who hasn't been involved in some kind of scandal involving the word sexual in it. After a while it seems almost expected.

I'm confused...how is sexual harrassment less bad than what John Edwards did? I mean, I think what he did was horrible, but it wasn't the sexual part that was bad, it was the infidelity...and honestly, maybe I'd have not even felt that the infidelity was that bad if not for Elizabeth Edwards' health condition. I'm just trying to get a grip on why sexually harrassing someone is less offensive to you than infidelity. And if Cain were married at the time, one could argue that the sexual harrassment WAS infidelity.
John Edwards is being charged with breaking Campaign Finance Laws to cover up his sexual escapades. That was the point I was trying to make.
John Edwards is being charged with breaking Campaign Finance Laws to cover up his sexual escapades. That was the point I was trying to make.

 

Ahhh...I get it now. I was thinking you were comparing his scandal (the affair) to the sexual harrassment, without regard to the CFL issue.

I've tried watching Fox News for the last two hours but no mention has been made of the allegations or response. Only that he has the lead in the latest poll. Dont tell me FN is fair and balanced. Not one mention in two hours.

Ann Coulter:

 

"Our blacks are so much better than their blacks."

 

 

I've tried watching Fox News for the last two hours but no mention has been made of the allegations or response. Only that he has the lead in the latest poll. Dont tell me FN is fair and balanced. Not one mention in two hours.

 

O'Reilly questioned him on it last night. But that's about all I watch of FNC, so they may indeed be lacking in their coverage of this. I would think if this were candidate Obama, they'd be talking about it more than ESPN talks/talked about Tim Tebow or Brett Favre.

I've tried watching Fox News for the last two hours but no mention has been made of the allegations or response. Only that he has the lead in the latest poll. Dont tell me FN is fair and balanced. Not one mention in two hours.

 

Maybe not mentioned in the time frame you watched, but from 7am to 9:15am it was mentioned several times.

It is also on their web site.

Edited by bballfamily
added comment

I've tried watching Fox News for the last two hours but no mention has been made of the allegations or response. Only that he has the lead in the latest poll. Dont tell me FN is fair and balanced. Not one mention in two hours.

 

Of course their not fair and balanced any more than the New York Times has all the news that's fit to print. It's just a motto.

 

However, I've seen the story several times on Fox today.

I've tried watching Fox News for the last two hours but no mention has been made of the allegations or response. Only that he has the lead in the latest poll. Dont tell me FN is fair and balanced. Not one mention in two hours.

 

I saw Greta, O'Reilly, The Five, Geraldo, Special Report all mention it.

  • Author

Fully realizing no candidate is going to be an expert in every phase the fact that Mr. Cain said that China "intends" to develop nuclear capabilities only adds to the picture I have of him as someone that is simply not ready.

Fully realizing no candidate is going to be an expert in every phase the fact that Mr. Cain said that China "intends" to develop nuclear capabilities only adds to the picture I have of him as someone that is simply not ready.

 

That aspect of him is what raises serious red flags about Cain in my mind.

 

But to be fair, I would have said the same thing about Obama, yet that has been the President's overwhelming strong suit (the only one, from my vantage point). Should Cain get the nomination, which I don't think he will, he would need to seek a similar Veep choice ala Obama. Get a Newt Gingrich type who could provide the much-needed experience to qualm concerns.

Maybe not mentioned in the time frame you watched, but from 7am to 9:15am it was mentioned several times.

It is also on their web site.

 

Of course their not fair and balanced any more than the New York Times has all the news that's fit to print. It's just a motto.

 

However, I've seen the story several times on Fox today.

 

I saw Greta, O'Reilly, The Five, Geraldo, Special Report all mention it.

 

 

As was stated......If this were candidate Obama it would be discussed at the top of the hour and every thirty minutes as well with running updates at the bottom of the screen on their ticker line. I'm not claiming other media outlets are fair and balanced but that is Fox News' motto and it is a false motto. Period. If this were about candidate Obama they would have already had the accuser on the set making the rounds to all of the shows that you all watch.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.