^

 

And then she would be hired next month to be on the Fox News Morning Show and guest starring on Hannity with Ann Coulter so they can talk about their impressive blacks.

 

Yes, the double entendre was intended. :lol:

Edited November 3, 201114 yr by PurplePride92

Yet another woman comes out with allegations concerning candidate Cain. Difference this time is that she's not anonymous.

 

This is getting positively Clintonesque.

As was stated......If this were candidate Obama it would be discussed at the top of the hour and every thirty minutes as well with running updates at the bottom of the screen on their ticker line. I'm not claiming other media outlets are fair and balanced but that is Fox News' motto and it is a false motto. Period. If this were about candidate Obama they would have already had the accuser on the set making the rounds to all of the shows that you all watch.

 

Sorry but I have to disagree. Fox has been covering it. Every time I have turned it on, the allegations pop up. Every show mentions it or has had a segment on it. Do you want them to just keep rolling a clip with Cain? There is only so much they can do. CNN has barely covered it today. They are obsessed with the Doctor Murray case. MSNBC has mentioned it but also is talking about the Murray case. You can't keep bashing them by coming up with a hypothetical situation.

Fully realizing no candidate is going to be an expert in every phase the fact that Mr. Cain said that China "intends" to develop nuclear capabilities only adds to the picture I have of him as someone that is simply not ready.

 

Agreed. I don't know about the rest of the posters but I do want someone who has held some form of political office.

Yet another woman comes out with allegations concerning candidate Cain. Difference this time is that she's not anonymous.

 

This is getting positively Clintonesque.

 

Accuser didn't file charges then, doesn't plan to now, and is being represented by a liberal activist who said that Cain tried to give her client his version of a stimulus package. With that comment she took a huge credibility hit.

Accuser didn't file charges then, doesn't plan to now, and is being represented by a liberal activist who said that Cain tried to give her client his version of a stimulus package. With that comment she took a huge credibility hit.

 

Who is the liberal activist? I thought I read that the latest person was going to be represented by attorney Gloria Allred. If so, she is the ultimate capitalist - politics will not get in her way of getting paid and getting publicity.

Who is the liberal activist? I thought I read that the latest person was going to be represented by attorney Gloria Allred. If so, she is the ultimate capitalist - politics will not get in her way of getting paid and getting publicity.

 

But if she can be painted as a liberal activist, surely the incident didn't happen.

Yet another woman comes out with allegations concerning candidate Cain. Difference this time is that she's not anonymous.

 

This is getting positively Clintonesque.

 

I thought Clarence Thomas, but you may be right. Hope not though.

I thought Clarence Thomas, but you may be right. Hope not though.

 

More than one woman accused Mr. thomas?

Sorry but I have to disagree. Fox has been covering it. Every time I have turned it on, the allegations pop up. Every show mentions it or has had a segment on it. Do you want them to just keep rolling a clip with Cain? There is only so much they can do. CNN has barely covered it today. They are obsessed with the Doctor Murray case. MSNBC has mentioned it but also is talking about the Murray case. You can't keep bashing them by coming up with a hypothetical situation.

 

It was a week ago when I made that post. Cain is getting more burn now.

More than one woman accused Mr. thomas?

 

I was referring more to the nature of the original accusations.

I was referring more to the nature of the original accusations.

 

Gotcha.

I'm never comfortable with the feeding frenzy that takes place with an issue like this. One says it happened and then many more come forth. It's really easy to say "it happened because so many are saying it happened" or "Where were these people 10 years ago? Why now?"

 

Ugly situation regardless if true or not.

I haven't been following this close enough I guess. Have we ever heard any specifics on what Cain allegedly did?

I haven't been following this close enough I guess. Have we ever heard any specifics on what Cain allegedly did?

 

Those than have come forward have said something like "groping" or "inappropriate touching."