Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Constitutional Right Restored

Featured Replies

Plenty of citizens from other countries thought the same thing, now they can't own guns.

 

The Constitution says nothing about permits being required, so I see Arizona doing nothing wrong.

 

 

It says nothing about the right to bear arms without permits either. :rolleyes:

  • Replies 100
  • Views 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The fear of millions of armed citizens resisting an intolerable, intrusive, abusive government.

It says nothing about the right to bear arms without permits either. :rolleyes:

 

Then according to how the Constitution was written, permits are not allowed.

As a permit would be an attempt to infringe upon a citizen's right to bear arms.

It says nothing about the right to bear arms without permits either. :rolleyes:

 

Yes it does. In the 10th Amendment.

 

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

 

Since the constitution does not give the FEDERAL (United States above)government the power to require permits it is up to the states (or the people) to decide.

The fear of millions of armed citizens resisting an intolerable, intrusive, abusive government.

 

Good words, thanks! Same way the protected us vs. Great Britian. Its something you take for granted til you need it, then its far too late. Even our government puts the control of the military into a few peoples hands. Right to bear arms is important to protect if other safeguards fall through.

I understand the right to bear arms. I appreciate this right for those not convicted of felonies or violent crimes. However, I have no problem requiring carry & conceal permits at all. I have to register my car, my dog, and everything else, ... I don't see this is as a problem. I am a conservative, but I don't see where having to register these or have a permit is an issue.

Plenty of citizens from other countries thought the same thing, now they can't own guns.

 

The Constitution says nothing about permits being required, so I see Arizona doing nothing wrong.

 

1. Do you have examples where this happened in other countries?

 

2. Other countries are not the US. Our representatives value keeping their power and jobs in DC and they know they would never get re-elected if they banned guns.

This is one thing I have mixed emotions about. I totally understand both sides point of view on this topic.

 

This topic is almost like the war on drugs. Is it that can be won?

Good words, thanks! Same way the protected us vs. Great Britian. Its something you take for granted til you need it, then its far too late. Even our government puts the control of the military into a few peoples hands. Right to bear arms is important to protect if other safeguards fall through.

 

Really, you think people holding hand guns could defend us against F16s. That is just CRAZY. There is no "armed protection" FROM the government in this country.

Really, you think people holding hand guns could defend us against F16s. That is just CRAZY. There is no "armed protection" FROM the government in this country.

 

 

I hope we never have to find out. But if we do I would rather find out with our guns in our hands, than to find out with our guns in the hands of the government.

I hope we never have to find out. But if we do I would rather find out with our guns in our hands, than to find out with our guns in the hands of the government.

 

Simple, but very true statement.

Really, you think people holding hand guns could defend us against F16s. That is just CRAZY. There is no "armed protection" FROM the government in this country.

 

No, I have common sense, but its a little harder considering and planning something knowing that in each home the people are armed and can protect themselves. Bombing your people with F-16's may be enough to wake up the anti-gunners though to the realization hey owning a gun is a pretty good right.

This is one thing I have mixed emotions about. I totally understand both sides point of view on this topic.

 

This topic is almost like the war on drugs. Is it that can be won?

 

How is like the war on drugs?

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."

-Thomas Jefferson, Proposed Virginia Constitution, 1776, Jefferson Papers 344

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."

-Thomas Jefferson, Proposed Virginia Constitution, 1776, Jefferson Papers 344

 

REALLY - What century are you guys living in.

 

this is rediculous.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.