Whether it was a hacker or an inside job, e-mails from the Climatic Research Unit of East Anglia of Great Britian have been released showing that data was manipulated to keep the lie of global warming going. Hopefully this will expose the global warming crowd for their attempt to grab power and money from everyone on the planet. Al Gore will have to find another way to fleece the American people.

Excuse me, as I now have to go fill-up my V-8, 4-wheeled drive Silverado.

These low lifes will stop at nothing to line their pockets. As I said before, the greatest scam of all time. :irked:

 

A consensus the Goreacle called it, yeah, a consensus of liars!!!

Just got home. Walked with my feet to the public transportation option and rode with numerous others all in one vehicle. Then, walked with my feet about 3 blocks to home. Ahhhh.....I saved money, got excercise and did a little something for the Earth! :walk:

Just got home. Walked with my feet to the public transportation option and rode with numerous others all in one vehicle. Then, walked with my feet about 3 blocks to home. Ahhhh.....I saved money, got excercise and did a little something for the Earth! :walk:

Atta girl! :clap:

This is what I've seen all over the news.

 

http://www.wdsu.com/news/21692266/detail.html

 

Which of the following data were manipulated?

 

The world's oceans have risen by about an inch and a half.

 

 

Droughts and wildfires have turned more severe worldwide, from the U.S. West to Australia to the Sahel desert of North Africa.

 

 

Species now in trouble because of changing climate include, not just the lumbering polar bear which has become a symbol of global warming, but also fragile butterflies, colorful frogs and entire stands of North American pine forests.

 

 

Temperatures over the past 12 years are 0.4 of a degree warmer than the dozen years leading up to 1997.

 

 

Even the gloomiest climate models back in the 1990s didn't forecast results quite this bad so fast.

 

Since an agreement to reduce greenhouse gas pollution was signed in Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997, the level of carbon dioxide in the air has increased 6.5 percent.

 

From 1997 to 2008, world carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels have increased 31 percent

 

U.S. emissions of this greenhouse gas rose 3.7 percent.

 

Emissions from China, now the biggest producer of this pollution, have more than doubled in that time period.

 

From 1993 to 1997, sea ice would shrink on average in the summer to about 2.7 million square miles. The average for the last five years is less than 2 million square miles. What's been lost is the size of Alaska.

 

Measurements show that since 2000, Greenland has lost more than 1.5 trillion tons of ice

 

Antarctica has lost about 1 trillion tons since 2002, according to two scientific studies published this fall.

 

And the rate of those losses is accelerating, so that Greenland's ice sheets are melting twice as fast now as they were just seven years ago, increasing sea level rise.

 

Another new post-1997 impact of global warming has scientists very concerned. The oceans are getting more acidic because more of the carbon dioxide in the air is being absorbed into the water.

 

I'm guessing it's safe to say that these are all lies?

This is what I've seen all over the news.

 

http://www.wdsu.com/news/21692266/detail.html

 

Which of the following data were manipulated?

 

The world's oceans have risen by about an inch and a half.

 

 

Droughts and wildfires have turned more severe worldwide, from the U.S. West to Australia to the Sahel desert of North Africa.

 

 

Species now in trouble because of changing climate include, not just the lumbering polar bear which has become a symbol of global warming, but also fragile butterflies, colorful frogs and entire stands of North American pine forests.

 

 

Temperatures over the past 12 years are 0.4 of a degree warmer than the dozen years leading up to 1997.

 

 

Even the gloomiest climate models back in the 1990s didn't forecast results quite this bad so fast.

 

Since an agreement to reduce greenhouse gas pollution was signed in Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997, the level of carbon dioxide in the air has increased 6.5 percent.

 

From 1997 to 2008, world carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels have increased 31 percent

 

U.S. emissions of this greenhouse gas rose 3.7 percent.

 

Emissions from China, now the biggest producer of this pollution, have more than doubled in that time period.

 

From 1993 to 1997, sea ice would shrink on average in the summer to about 2.7 million square miles. The average for the last five years is less than 2 million square miles. What's been lost is the size of Alaska.

 

Measurements show that since 2000, Greenland has lost more than 1.5 trillion tons of ice

 

Antarctica has lost about 1 trillion tons since 2002, according to two scientific studies published this fall.

 

And the rate of those losses is accelerating, so that Greenland's ice sheets are melting twice as fast now as they were just seven years ago, increasing sea level rise.

 

Another new post-1997 impact of global warming has scientists very concerned. The oceans are getting more acidic because more of the carbon dioxide in the air is being absorbed into the water.

 

I'm guessing it's safe to say that these are all lies?

Any data that proves that the climate changes are man made?? What caused the natural changes before?

This is what I've seen all over the news.

 

http://www.wdsu.com/news/21692266/detail.html

 

Which of the following data were manipulated?

 

The world's oceans have risen by about an inch and a half.

 

 

Droughts and wildfires have turned more severe worldwide, from the U.S. West to Australia to the Sahel desert of North Africa.

 

 

Species now in trouble because of changing climate include, not just the lumbering polar bear which has become a symbol of global warming, but also fragile butterflies, colorful frogs and entire stands of North American pine forests.

 

 

Temperatures over the past 12 years are 0.4 of a degree warmer than the dozen years leading up to 1997.

 

 

Even the gloomiest climate models back in the 1990s didn't forecast results quite this bad so fast.

 

Since an agreement to reduce greenhouse gas pollution was signed in Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997, the level of carbon dioxide in the air has increased 6.5 percent.

 

From 1997 to 2008, world carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels have increased 31 percent

 

U.S. emissions of this greenhouse gas rose 3.7 percent.

 

Emissions from China, now the biggest producer of this pollution, have more than doubled in that time period.

 

From 1993 to 1997, sea ice would shrink on average in the summer to about 2.7 million square miles. The average for the last five years is less than 2 million square miles. What's been lost is the size of Alaska.

 

Measurements show that since 2000, Greenland has lost more than 1.5 trillion tons of ice

 

Antarctica has lost about 1 trillion tons since 2002, according to two scientific studies published this fall.

 

And the rate of those losses is accelerating, so that Greenland's ice sheets are melting twice as fast now as they were just seven years ago, increasing sea level rise.

 

Another new post-1997 impact of global warming has scientists very concerned. The oceans are getting more acidic because more of the carbon dioxide in the air is being absorbed into the water.

 

I'm guessing it's safe to say that these are all lies?

So many just want desperately to believe that mankind has no responsibility to be a good steward of his own planet. Up to now, and for too long, he has not been. He's just beginning to reap his bitter harvest.

So many just want desperately to believe that mankind has no responsibility to be a good steward of his own planet. Up to now, and for too long, he has not been. He's just beginning to reap his bitter harvest.

What caused the climate changes before man was involved?? Any data or proof that it is totally man caused now?? We do have some responsibilities but lets not over react...

What caused the climate changes before man was involved?? Any data or proof that it is totally man caused now?? We do have some responsibilities but lets not over react...

They won't have an answer yet, they're waiting for the Goreacle to tell them what to think...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

j/k guys, don't take me too serious, I have to have a little fun with you two.

Just got home. Walked with my feet to the public transportation option and rode with numerous others all in one vehicle. Then, walked with my feet about 3 blocks to home. Ahhhh.....I saved money, got excercise and did a little something for the Earth! :walk:

So, if anyone passed gas on the bus does that constitute global warming?

You guys want to know about global warming? Live with a women who has had a hysterectomy and she runs out of her medication!!!:eek:

With regards to the miniscule rise over the last 12 years in temperature, 2009's mild summer temps globally weren't factored in and will more than likely cancel out any noted rise from the past 12 years. Global warming is hooey. If it were warmer, would this guy have grown a beard?

One of the things I have seen from the analysis of these emails is that the generally used models ignored one important factor - the energy level from the only source of energy in our solar system - the sun.

 

Look at the graphs in this URL and see if you don't see something that looks a lot like the graphs from the Global Warming crowd:

 

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Solar_Activity_Proxies.png

 

In general, the radiation of the sun corolates to the number of sunspots.

 

Everyone sees the cooler tempratures and lack of hurricanes this year - right? Guess what the recent sunspots has been?

 

Here is an article that explains the issue in laymans terms pretty well:

 

http://cjonline.com/news/local/2009-09-20/earth_approaching_sunspot_records

 

" In July through August, 51 consecutive days passed without a spot, one day short of tying the record of 52 days from the early 1900s."

 

more...

 

"A sunspot, Perry explains, is a location on the sun's surface that is cooler than the surrounding area. When there are more sunspots, the sun's surface becomes more dynamic and an opposite effect takes place, releasing more heat and energy when other parts of the sun become hotter.

 

A solar minimum is when the amount of spots on the sun is at a low and the reverse is true for a solar maximum. The complete solar cycle is about an 11-year process. Perry says the current solar minimum could continue into 2010.

 

"There's a fair chance it will be a cooler winter than last year," Perry said.

 

Perry said there is a feeling from some in the scientific community the Earth may be entering into a grand minimum, which is an extended period with low numbers of sunspots that creates cooler temperatures. The year without a summer, which was 1816, was during a grand minimum in 1800 to 1830 when Europe became cooler, Perry said. Another grand minimum was in 1903 to 1913."

Whether it was a hacker or an inside job, e-mails from the Climatic Research Unit of East Anglia of Great Britian have been released showing that data was manipulated to keep the lie of global warming going. Hopefully this will expose the global warming crowd for their attempt to grab power and money from everyone on the planet. Al Gore will have to find another way to fleece the American people.

Excuse me, as I now have to go fill-up my V-8, 4-wheeled drive Silverado.

 

Oh, the irony! :lol:

 

Gore may not be fleecing you, but the gas/oil giants in the US and Middle East sure thank you! :thumb:

Oh, the irony! :lol:

 

Gore may not be fleecing you, but the gas/oil giants in the US and Middle East sure thank you! :thumb:

 

I would rather use some of the 80 billion barrels of reserves we have. And think of all the gas taxes I pay to help maintain our highways and all the jobs that are created in the oil industry by my use of gas.