futurecoach Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 Really? I'd like to see how many people honesty think that was a touchdown; I bet there are far more that don't think it was. I am not a UC fan and I thought it was a touchdown... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FormerCawoodTrojan Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 I picked WVU and had money on them to win...there were 4 of us watching the game and we all thought it was a TD. Very close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shooter Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 I agree that based on what was shown on TV there wasn't enough to overturn the call. However, the one angle that you would really want to see would be the angle directly down the goal line and that wasn't shown on TV. The angle they showed wasn't quite directly down the line. I am surprised at the number of times that angle is needed and isn't available on TV. You would think that for a nationally televised game they would permanently place a goal line camera at each end. Maybe even two at each end to cover both sides of the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great Game Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 I agree that based on what was shown on TV there wasn't enough to overturn the call. However, the one angle that you would really want to see would be the angle directly down the goal line and that wasn't shown on TV. The angle they showed wasn't quite directly down the line. I am surprised at the number of times that angle is needed and isn't available on TV. You would think that for a nationally televised game they would permanently place a goal line camera at each end. Maybe even two at each end to cover both sides of the field. The television viewers didn't get the benefit of, or at least they didn't show the replay this way, of super slow motion. The folks that look at the replay can get every angle and had a perfect side shot that they could slow way down to see if the ball touched the line. (I watched the game and they showed the side view two or three times, but never slowed it right down):idunno: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyDanza Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 Really? I'd like to see how many people honesty think that was a touchdown; I bet there are far more that don't think it was. I was pulling for UC to win but it didn't look like it crossed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Run To State Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 I'm not calling you a liar, I'm stating what every person that wasn't rooting for Cincinnati realizes.So, those rooting against UC thought it wasn't a touchdown? Shocking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LCPATS Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 I thought it was a touchdown. However, I thought it was close enough to not reverse the call on the field. I thought it to be one of those deals where that was close enough to stick with the call on the field. UC is doing a lot for themselves in terms of perception these past two weeks. Teams are having their way on their defense. If they don't figure out a way to slow down the run, they are going to have their hands full with Pitt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Rookie Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 I didn't think there was enough to overturn it. The ball may have got to the goal line, but he was bobbling it. Way too close to change it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSC Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 I think it was a TD, but if they would have let the call on the field stand I would have been fine w/ that. It was that close. There are so many close calls in so many big games that anyone who isn't for replay leaves me scratching my head. I told people I was w/ they were going to call it a TD. I thought UC was due a "questionable" call since all the other top teams have had them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 http://sports.webshots.com/photo/2460012030105313007VeyLrG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Rookie Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 http://sports.webshots.com/photo/2460012030105313007VeyLrG Bobble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 Bobble I think that is a much more valid argument than if the ball crossed the plain... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Original Rookie Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 I think that is a much more valid argument than if the ball crossed the plain... Agreed. The view from the field goal post showed the ball moving, but you can't tell if it is after he crossed the goal line or not. Too close to change, JMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 Agreed. The view from the field goal post showed the ball moving, but you can't tell if it is after he crossed the goal line or not. Too close to change, JMO. From the still it appears he has two hands on the ball when it crossed the line, but like I said it was very very close... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted November 14, 2009 Share Posted November 14, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts