October 27, 200817 yr Yep! It's the ole reverse psychology deal. It Didn't work when they backed Kerry in 04 so they're trying to reverse it. Who cares? Some might not admit it, but this has been a pretty dirty election season :thumb:
October 28, 200817 yr A) If Al-Qaeda wanted Obama to win, they would publicy state that they back McCain B) This almost sounds like more cheap politics - making up a story like this to damage McCain's team C) Who cares what Al-Qaeda says? Are we going to allow them to control us? By your reasoning, what would they state if they wanted McCain to win?
October 28, 200817 yr By your reasoning, what would they state if they wanted McCain to win? That they support Obama.
October 28, 200817 yr That they support Obama. I think they want Obama to win. That way he begins to pull our troops out and they can claim victory in the near future. If McCain keeps troops in they won't be able to claim victory until we are no longer in the Middle East. In their eyes they have already won the war because A) we are still there and B) our economy is struggling.
October 28, 200817 yr I think they want Obama to win. That way he begins to pull our troops out and they can claim victory in the near future. If McCain keeps troops in they won't be able to claim victory until we are no longer in the Middle East. In their eyes they have already won the war because A) we are still there and B) our economy is struggling. That's my point. I think they definately want Obama in the White House.
October 28, 200817 yr Author Anyone see the date on this piece? Oct 21. That was last week. Why haven't we heard more about this? Must be that darn liberal media at work again. :irked:
October 28, 200817 yr What about all of the innocent civilians killed in Iraq and Afghanistan? Does anyone care about them? Don't be critical of the military action in Afghanistan. The Dem's were for this action. Being down on all military action makes you sound like a weak kneed pacifist.
October 28, 200817 yr I couldn't disagree with you more. The Surge is working and will continue to, we will win this war and it wont take 10 more years under McCain IMO. If we elect Obama, you would be correct. So, if McCain is elected, you think he will successfully wrap up the war in something less than 10 years, but longer than it would take for Obama to redeploy our forces to Afghanistan (where they've always been needed more to fight the real al Qaeda threat)? I find it interesting that in the almost 6 years we have been in Iraq, victory has been "just around the corner" as long as we 'don't cut and run' or 'surrender'. You say you disagree with me, but your stubborn insistence on staying in Iraq indefinitely proves my point perfectly: Al Qaeda knows they can bleed America by keeping us tied down there.
October 28, 200817 yr Don't be critical of the military action in Afghanistan. The Dem's were for this action. Being down on all military action makes you sound like a weak kneed pacifist. Thankfully this is a free country and I am allowed to be critical of whatever I want.
October 28, 200817 yr I don't understand your point. War is war, civilians are killed all the time. You're trying to act like this is something new. It isn't something new, however it is still an awful thing and you act like it is no big deal.
October 28, 200817 yr :lol: Have fun with this one, guys. Is it because Al-Qaeda supports the 2nd Amendment? :lol:
October 28, 200817 yr It isn't something new, however it is still an awful thing and you act like it is no big deal.I don't know anyone that is. It's a fact of war that can't be escaped, although this country does it's best to keep it from happening.
October 29, 200817 yr I don't know anyone that is. It's a fact of war that can't be escaped, although this country does it's best to keep it from happening. Well, except for that Truman guy.
October 29, 200817 yr That is a terrible terrible way to look at it IMO. We would not stand for civilian casualties here in America. If we were attacked and the attacking forces called the civilian casualties "collateral damage" and said they really meant to kill soldiers and government officials...would we be okay with that? That was 911 and no, we will not stand for it. More American civilians were killed in a matter of minutes on Sept. 11 2001 then troops lost in the seven years of this war. Al Qeada doesn't care who they kill. Just another thought on loss of civilian life, have you ever thought how many innocent lives are lost daily in the US due to gang violence? I would imagine that is not a low number.
October 29, 200817 yr That was 911 and no, we will not stand for it. More American civilians were killed in a matter of minutes on Sept. 11 2001 then troops lost in the seven years of this war. Al Qeada doesn't care who they kill. Just another thought on loss of civilian life, have you ever thought how many innocent lives are lost daily in the US due to gang violence? I would imagine that is not a low number. Aren't we involved in two wars right now?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.