October 29, 200817 yr ANYWAY! I say that Al Qaeda wants McCain/Palin elected because that would put another hothead in the White House who is willing to engage them, at tremendous cost, in areas that are not central to their terrorism operations. Imagine, for the cost of a few box cutters, pilot training sessions, and some under the table funding from the countries that sell us our oil, al Qaeda has been able to wear out the high tech U.S. Army and bleed us to the tune of well over a trillion dollars... :thumb: Al-Qaeda and other terrorist cells don't have the manpower or the money to take on the US straight-up so they use subversive tactics to bleed what they can and stir up more supporters.
October 29, 200817 yr Or they're simply trying to get people to vote for Obama so he can pull out and they can have free reign to train and plot. Hmmm, I think my idea makes more sense. :thumb: They've proven they're smart enough to know what their endorsement would do.
October 29, 200817 yr Wait a minute. When a terrorist organization (Hamas) endorses Obama, it's because they want him to become President because he's soft. But when a terrorist organization (Al Qaeda) endorses McCain, it's a clever reverse psychology ploy to get Obama elected because he's soft. I guess no matter what happens, it can be explained because Obama is friendly to terrorists. I get it now.
October 29, 200817 yr Wait a minute. When a terrorist organization (Hamas) endorses Obama, it's because they want him to become President because he's soft. But when a terrorist organization (Al Qaeda) endorses McCain, it's a clever reverse psychology ploy to get Obama elected because he's soft. I guess no matter what happens, it can be explained because Obama is friendly to terrorists. I get it now. Is it so hard to understand that YES, they want the guy (Obama) that will be soft, plus he has zero experience? It would only be clever to someone with a simple mind IMO, however, there are a lot of voters in this country that fit that description.
October 29, 200817 yr Thought this thread was about Al Quedia which does bring military deaths into the conversation. Abortion deaths or US citizens killing each other was brought into the discussion for some reason I don't understand. To say he shamed every soldier that died in Iraq is quite a stretch. You also seem into us flexing our military muscle just to show people we don't mess around. I'm totally into flexing ones muscles, I work out.
October 29, 200817 yr Yes, and all Americans were misled by the Bush administration about 1) the certainty of Saddam's possession of WMD's and WMD programs 2) the "imminent" threat that the U.S. would be attacked by (nonexistent) Iraqi WMD's and 3) the completely fabricated link between 9/11 and Saddam Hussein. Your 'overwhelming majority' argument is overwhelmingly flawed. Haha yea, it was all just a ploy to trick the American people. Man we sure are guliable.
October 29, 200817 yr Funny thing is if this were reversed and Al Qaeda endorsed Obama, it would be a much bigger deal... Duh....
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.