November 1, 200718 yr Major Infractions by University since 1963: ****example 1: Institution: University of Kentucky Date: 19-APR-64 Facts Summary: Out-of-season practice; questionable practice. Violation Summary: Out-of-season practice; questionable practice. Penalty Summary: Probation. Involved Sports: Football Involved Penalties: TV: 0 yrs Reduction in Financial Aid: No Postseason: 1 yrs Recruiting: No Probation: 1 yrs Show Cause Action: No ****example 2: Institution: University of Kentucky Date: 01-DEC-76 Facts Summary: Improper entertainment, financial aid, lodging and transportation; extra benefits; out-of-season practice; complimentary tickets; improper recruiting entertainment, inducements and transportation; excessive number of official visits; outside fund; questionable practice; institutional control; certification of compliance. Violation Summary: Improper entertainment, financial aid, lodging and transportation; extra benefits; out-of-season practice; complimentary tickets; improper recruiting entertainment, inducements and transportation; excessive number of official visits; outside fund; questionable practice; institutional control; certification of compliance. Penalty Summary: Maximum of 25 initial football grants for 1977-78; maximum of three initial men's basketball grants for 1977-78 and 1978-79. FOOTBALL: one-year postseason ban and television ban. Involved Sports: Football Men's Basketball Involved Penalties: TV: 1 yrs Reduction in Financial Aid: Yes Postseason: 1 yrs Recruiting: No Probation: 2 yrs Show Cause Action: No ****example 3: Institution: University of Kentucky Date: 03-MAR-88 Facts Summary: Failure to cooperate fully with investigation. Violation Summary: Failure to cooperate fully with investigation. Penalty Summary: Public reprimand; annual compliance reports for 1987-88, 1988-89 and 1989-90. Involved Sports: Men's Basketball Involved Penalties: TV: 0 yrs Reduction in Financial Aid: No Postseason: 0 yrs Recruiting: No Probation: 0 yrs Show Cause Action: No ****example 4: Institution: University of Kentucky Date: 19-MAY-89 Facts Summary: Cash provided to prospective student-athlete:lol::lol:(and you're whining about phone calls); academic fraud; unethical conduct; lack of institutional control. [uPHELD AFTER APPEAL BY COACH.] Violation Summary: IMPERMISSIBLE RECRUITING: assistant coach sent twenty $50 bills to prospective student-athlete's father; athletics representative provided lodging, improper transportation, clothing and meals to prospective student-athletes. ACADEMIC ELIGIBILITY: academic fraud on precollege entrance exam; improper certification and participation of ineligible student-athlete. LACK OF INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL. UNETHICAL CONDUCT. EXTRA BENEFITS: improper lodging and credit arrangements. [uPHELD AFTER APPEAL BY COACH.] Penalty Summary: Public reprimand; annual reports; maximum of three initial grants for 1989-90 and 1990-91; return of revenue for 1988 NCAA championship; disassociation of athletics representative. [uPHELD AFTER APPEAL BY COACH.] Involved Sports: Men's Basketball Involved Penalties: TV: 1 yrs Reduction in Financial Aid: Yes Postseason: 2 yrs Recruiting: No Probation: 3 yrs Show Cause Action: Yes ****example 5: Institution: University of Kentucky Date: 31-JAN-02 Facts Summary: Violations of NCAA Bylaws governing recruiting, extra benefits, falsification of recruiting records, failure to control salary of an employee, failure in fiscal control of an outside organization, unethical conduct (including academic fraud), failure to monitor and a lack of institutional control. Violation Summary: Recruiting inducements for prospective student-athletes and high-school coaches; impermissible tryout; unethical conduct; academic fraud; falsification of recruiting records; institutional control of recruiting funds; failure to control salary of employee; violation of supplemental pay provision; failure in fiscal control of outside agency; failure to monitor and a lack of institutional control. Also, numerous secondary violations. Penalty Summary: Public reprimand and censure; three years of probation; postseason ban for 2002, reduction of initial grants in the sport of football for 2002-03 to 16, in 2003-04 to 18, and in 2004-05 to 22; reduction in the total number of football counters from 85 to 80; show-cause provision for the former recruiting coordinator for a period of eight years; signature control of all booster club accounts and annual reporting. [uPHELD ON APPEAL] Recruiting Coordinator's Appeal University's Appeal Involved Sports: Football Involved Penalties: TV: yrs Reduction in Financial Aid: Yes Postseason: 1 yrs Recruiting: Yes Probation: 3 yrs Show Cause Action: Yes --------------------------------------------------------------- Indiana: No Records Found :scared::scared::scared::scared::scared:
November 1, 200718 yr At least UK's not #1. :D:D https://web1.ncaa.org/pdf/convert?pdfurl=http://goomer.ncaa.org:2020/wdbctx/LSDBi/lsdbi.lsdbi_mi_rpts.mostinfractionsrpt
November 1, 200718 yr Author So all this justifies the cheating coach you now have. Do you really not see the difference in Major and Secondary violations. Let me help, it's HUGE!
November 1, 200718 yr Author At least UK's not #1. :D:D https://web1.ncaa.org/pdf/convert?pdfurl=http://goomer.ncaa.org:2020/wdbctx/LSDBi/lsdbi.lsdbi_mi_rpts.mostinfractionsrpt :thumb::laugh:
November 1, 200718 yr Do you really not see the difference in Major and Secondary violations. Let me help, it's HUGE! Isnt Cheating Cheating?
November 1, 200718 yr Author Isnt Cheating Cheating? I don't know it is? So now you're saying calling a person too many times is the same as paying that kid? :eek::eek::eek:
November 1, 200718 yr Is he not the same coach, unless I'm remembering this story incorrectly, who had to sign a section on his current contract about if problems following him from his old school show up during the current investigation against that school (the old one) and himself, that he could be immediately dismissed???:confused: It looks bad for UK in the above postings, but it was all DIFFERENT coaches (except 88/89) doing it. This guy has been caught twice now (at DIFFERENT schools) and apparently can't learn the rules.....Matter of time, if it keeps up, like it is, that the Hoosiers may just join us on that list.....Once under the microscope, hard to get away from the lens..... (Didn't the investigation at the old school involve just a LITTLE more than some over the top phone calls, also????)
November 1, 200718 yr I don't know it is? So now you're saying calling a person too many times is the same as paying that kid? :eek::eek::eek: Who has ever said that? Let me rephrase, who has ever said the two were on the same level of wrong? Homicide and Jaywalking are both crimes, but on way different levels. Just like texting and paying a kid are both against NCAA rule, but on way different levels. I really think the argument you are trying to nail home is pretty self explanatory to everyone.
November 1, 200718 yr 98NCCalum: Please list the infractions committed by the current staff at each school.
November 1, 200718 yr I really think someone has way to much time on their hands. I sure didn't read anything I did not already know. :sleep: I sure hope researching all this meaningless info is done on free time and not some employer's. I think the UK fans are getting on someones nerves.
November 1, 200718 yr If you're going to lump all infractions by schools, might want to Include chair tossing, throat choking, verbal abuse and related at IU.....:sssh: Many programs get infractions, penalties and Rules violations. It's the school which seems to tolerate it, that should be ashamed.
November 1, 200718 yr If you look at the last 2 infractions, which were huge! UK had a complete overhaul of the program both times. No one is really taking up for Hal Mumme and Eddie Sutton and fans are very upset about what they did. As for Indiana, I do not think Sampson should be fired and its not as big of a deal as what happened at UK, but its not something that should be accepted either. The big problem I see with all of this is this is the 2nd time this has happened. I believe a lot the UK fans on here are overreacting a bit (even though it is cheating, I do think it goes on a ton) while the Indiana fan(s) are acting like it is not a big deal and shrug it off as nothing. I believe there should be a middle ground in all this.
November 1, 200718 yr 98NCCalum's version of the "No Spin Zone"? How come you picked 1963 for the cut-off? Why not use the default of 1953? So you could post Indiana: No Records Found ? :lol::lol: That's funny. Notice that during all of those years of Bobby Knight "abuse", IU had no NCAA violations. That would explain why they are having a hard time dealing with this situation. For anybody who cares, here is the link where 98 got his info. https://goomer.ncaa.org/wdbctx/LSDBi/LSDBi.MajorInfPackage.MI_Search_Input?p_Cmd=Go_Search Search using University of Oklahoma. That's more relevant to the current issue.
November 1, 200718 yr Hey as the old adage goes in SEC football if you aren't cheating, it's because you aren't trying hard enough.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.