There better then UL in almost EVERY catagory. Facts are facts, get over it...

 

True, but in all seriousness, if you were to evaluate both teams right now, you gotta admit the Cards are looking better. Cats haven't looked that good all year. Certainly not good enough to hold a 12 RPI ranking, or whatever it is now.

True, but in all seriousness, if you were to evaluate both teams right now, you gotta admit the Cards are looking better. Cats haven't looked that good all year. Certainly not good enough to hold a 12 RPI ranking, or whatever it is now.

It's computer ranking's...There pretty smart now-a-days...

It's computer ranking's...There pretty smart now-a-days...

 

They certainly have the BCS down to a science. Love that commercial.

Just got finished listening to Gotlieb on ESPN and he's comparing Missouri St to UK and he's saying they deserve to be in over UK??? Is he serious, he said what UK's done is nothing different than MizzSt in conference, beating the bottom dwellars, now I know the Valley is a good conference but the bottom of the SEC is the bottom of the SEC not the bottom of the Valley. On top of that they were beaten by Winthrop in the bracket buster, is this guy serious???

No, they don't.....but they will.

PRI 9 Vs 53

SOS 1 VS What??

 

 

 

There you go.

But...im reality they are comparative...not what a PC thinks...my team is not very good, certainly not the #17 team in the land.

But...im reality they are comparative...not what a PC thinks...my team is not very good, certainly not the #17 team in the land.

 

But if that's the system, or at least part of it, that is used to determine who gets in and who's left home, then UK definitely deserves to be in.

^ a team's RPI is not the system...

 

1 - record -vs- Top 25 RPI

2 - last ten

3 - record -vs- Top 50 RPI

4 - record -vs- Top 100 RPI

Ok compair them then.^^

No, they don't.....but they will.

I just don't see how you can say that. Compare UK's resume with other bubble teams and UK's is much better almost every time.

^ How about Missouri State?

It's honestly not worth arguing. If you don't think UK has a good enough resume to get in it's simply blind hatred.

^ How about Missouri State?

 

 

BTW, who said Missouri State didn't deserve to get in???

Anyone want to compair Dukes "resume" to UK's? I honestly haven't seen it but I would like to.

^ They are in....if I were the tourney committee...I would make an example and leave both them, and Duke home...but Duke has a better argument.