As GT would say NEXT!!!!

This isn't Louisville vs. Kentucky.

 

Strength of Schedule is great BUT like in football shouldn't you have to win some of those tough games?

 

If any other team with the same "credentials" with a name other then Kentucky would they get in? I really don't think they would.

Game over.

They may have lost some games they should have won, they maybe won some games they shouldn't.

 

BUT facts are they have played a tough schedule, in a tough conference and still have gotten over 20 wins. I know 11 losses are not acceptable for UK basketball, but they still deserve a spot in the big dance. Even if they might not be there longer than 10-15 minutes. lol

This isn't Louisville vs. Kentucky.

 

Strength of Schedule is great BUT like in football shouldn't you have to win some of those tough games?

 

If any other team with the same "credentials" with a name other then Kentucky would they get in? I really don't think they would.

Then how is UL getting in?

Simple they beat Louisville. :lol:

I'll take where Louisville is at right now but if your season is built on a win in December then congratulations. Maybe they'll hang a banner in Rupp.

This isn't Louisville vs. Kentucky.

 

Strength of Schedule is great BUT like in football shouldn't you have to win some of those tough games?

If any other team with the same "credentials" with a name other then Kentucky would they get in? I really don't think they would.

 

 

Like it or not, that's one of the tools the committee uses to seed teams.

Then how is UL getting in?

 

Success trend in late season games.

 

2 wins on the road againt top 25 teams during that time.

Looks like the UK haters are voting them out. UK fans are voting them in. It basically comes down to Homeless Camel who is impartial. He says UK is in. End of story.

Success trend in late season games.

 

2 wins on the road againt top 25 teams during that time.

Ok and UK has them in all other aspects!

Like it or not, that's one of the tools the committee uses to seed teams.

So is success in late season games.

Absolutely they deserve a bid.

This isn't Louisville vs. Kentucky.

 

Strength of Schedule is great BUT like in football shouldn't you have to win some of those tough games?

 

If any other team with the same "credentials" with a name other then Kentucky would they get in? I really don't think they would.

 

Michigan is 21-11 (same record as KY), 53 in RPI, not sure about strength of schedule. 4 losses to the #1 team (3 to Ohio State and 1 to UCLA who was #1 at the time they played Michigan, I believe).

 

Signature wins were Michigan State, Indiana and Davidson.

 

But the analysts say that they are out of the tournament.

Michigan is 21-11 (same record as KY), 53 in RPI, not sure about strength of schedule. 4 losses to the #1 team (3 to Ohio State and 1 to UCLA who was #1 at the time they played Michigan, I believe).

 

Signature wins were Michigan State, Indiana and Davidson.

 

But the analysts say that they are out of the tournament.

There you have it.

Just because you hate UK doesn't mean they don't deserve to be in.