Final Fours

Duke 10

UNC 9

Kansas 6.

That's actually 11.

That's actually 11.

Since 1979?

It did say since UK won in 1978, which would begin in 1979.

 

If you include 1978 in it, Duke gets a bigger edge in Final Fours, but UK would jump up and tie them in national championships.

 

I think the numbers show Duke is in front in that time period, but yeah, dominant is probably strong. I do have to say I think that the period from 1986-1994 when Duke played in 7 Final Fours, 5 championship games, and won 2 titles was the most dominant period since UCLA.

I do have to say I think that the period from 1986-1994 when Duke played in 7 Final Fours, 5 championship games, and won 2 titles was the most dominant period since UCLA.

 

I agree. And it's likely not to be matched again under the current rules.

^ I agree with all of the above...sorry about the error.

Yes...16 seed

We don't deserve it over Syracuse. They beat Georgetown, Marquette and had a 10-6 conference record.