4 minutes ago, CAT DIESEL POWER said:

Why even say that you know something if you aren't going to share? To me that screams that you don't know anything. 

 

I will give you what I do know 100% and that is Tyler Ray is for sure out. Can't speak on the other two that someone said were out but I know about Tyler for sure.

I don’t think Tyler was ever offered the job .. not sure if he even applied. 

3 minutes ago, CentralSports said:

I don’t think Tyler was ever offered the job .. not sure if he even applied. 

You are correct on both accounts.

41 minutes ago, CAT DIESEL POWER said:

Why even say that you know something if you aren't going to share? To me that screams that you don't know anything. 

 

I will give you what I do know 100% and that is Tyler Ray is for sure out. Can't speak on the other two that someone said were out but I know about Tyler for sure.

Maybe the person that told you asked you not to share until pretty much official !

I can’t believe gchs_uk9 doesn’t have any names ? 

2 minutes ago, CentralSports said:

I can’t believe gchs_uk9 doesn’t have any names ? 

Having something and sharing something are two different things.

As always everyone, you share what you feel comfortable sharing, no pressure. 

1 hour ago, BEChargers said:

Maybe the person that told you asked you not to share until pretty much official !

So then don’t share at all problem solved.

The thread sure changed quick . Now everything is top secret after 18k views. 

14 minutes ago, CAT DIESEL POWER said:

So then don’t share at all problem solved.

I don't see a problem that needs solving. 

9 minutes ago, BEChargers said:

I don't see a problem that needs solving. 

If someone ask you not to share information then you shouldn’t even share that you have the information. That’s just brings more issues that aren’t needed in a discussion. Besides the whole point of a forum is discussion and conversation. Then why say hey I have info but I’m not willing to talk about it. Makes no sense.

My post was a response to people saying Garrard Co. was screwing up and had no interest in the job.  My point was to share that they had very good interest and possible great news and interest.  Why are those things not needed in the discussion.  Why do you decide how the discussion goes?  I can add that the new coach needs to change the school colors if I want. (I don't, but I can discuss anything I wish to discuss).  Unless it's against the posted rules and guidelines set forth by the administration of the website I can really add anything I wish to the discussion without anyone else's permission.  I also decide how much is too much to decide.  Maybe Garrard should hire a pair of Co-head coaches?  Probably a terrible idea but I can discuss it if I want.  See how that works?

Rule 2 reads in part:

Do not comment on the manner in which another member has posted.

Rule 12 reads in part:

Discussion of elements of any post(s), whether your own or anyone else’s, that you suspect are a violation of the BGP Terms of Service. Site moderation is to be left to the moderation/administration staff. Again, if you feel that a specific post violates our Terms of Service, please report it using the "Report" feature in the “More Options” menu that can be accessed by clicking the “…” icon located in the upper right-hand side of every post. 

Any mention of prohibited subject matter. (e.g. – “I’d discuss further but it’s a violation,” “unfortunately we can’t talk about that because it is against the BGP rules/Terms of Service," "let's not do anything to get this thread shut down," "please follow the rules/Terms of Service so we can discuss this.")

I think all of this will be over Wednesday and everybody in Golden Lions country will be pretty pumped !!

29 minutes ago, BEChargers said:

I think all of this will be over Wednesday and everybody in Golden Lions country will be pretty pumped !!

No interviews? 

Great hire for Garrard County! All I’m going to say is Welcome BACK both of you! 

13 hours ago, BEChargers said:

My post was a response to people saying Garrard Co. was screwing up and had no interest in the job.  My point was to share that they had very good interest and possible great news and interest.  Why are those things not needed in the discussion.  Why do you decide how the discussion goes?  I can add that the new coach needs to change the school colors if I want. (I don't, but I can discuss anything I wish to discuss).  Unless it's against the posted rules and guidelines set forth by the administration of the website I can really add anything I wish to the discussion without anyone else's permission.  I also decide how much is too much to decide.  Maybe Garrard should hire a pair of Co-head coaches?  Probably a terrible idea but I can discuss it if I want.  See how that works?

I dont disagree with anything you said. I was just simply saying to me it makes no sense to say you have information if you are not willing to share. In my opinion it would be better to just not say anything at all. You see I respect your opinion on how it should work and that also means I am allowed to have my own. See how that works?