Actually free speech without repruccisions from the government.

 

Correct. That was implied.

Correct. That was implied.

 

It also seemed implied that free speech didn't apply to giving ones opinion about an individual.

It also seemed implied that free speech didn't apply to giving ones opinion about an individual.

 

That's not the freedom of speech that was fought for.

Yahoo security warned a consultant to the DNC that her personal Yahoo email account has been hacked by "state sponsored" hackers before this particular hack on the DNC.

That's not the freedom of speech that was fought for.

 

I mean I think your talking semantics now. Obviously the war was fought against a King but the bill of rights was written to protect all speech. We fought for that Bill of Rights.

 

The only Religion we fought for at the start was the right to practice your form of Christianity. But the Bill of rights said all religions. So I mean come on Clyde.

Actually free speech without repruccisions from the government.

 

AGAINST the government without repercussions from the government.

 

Yes - we can stand against the administration that holds the office of Presidency - will all our words and statements.

 

We can not overthrow the Constitution. The biggest threat to the Constitution is the government itself. And the two are not one in the same. The two are basically natural enemies. We The People better be careful with of these two enemies are in our interest.

AGAINST the government without repercussions from the government.

 

Yes - we can stand against the administration that holds the office of Presidency - will all our words and statements.

 

We can not overthrow the Constitution. The biggest threat to the Constitution is the government itself. And the two are not one in the same. The two are basically natural enemies. We The People better be careful with of these two enemies are in our interest.

Great post.

I mean I think your talking semantics now. Obviously the war was fought against a King but the bill of rights was written to protect all speech. We fought for that Bill of Rights. The only Religion we fought for at the start was the right to practice your form of Christianity. But the Bill of rights said all religions. So I mean come on Clyde.

 

Look back at the comment that I replied to.

Interesting read. Two different Russian agencies were involved. Evidence shows that they changed some docs.

 

 

All Signs Point to Russia Being Behind the DNC Hack | Motherboard

Interesting read. Two different Russian agencies were involved. Evidence shows that they changed some docs.

 

 

All Signs Point to Russia Being Behind the DNC Hack | Motherboard

 

I'm not concerned with who did the hacking as much as what was uncovered.

I'm not concerned with who did the hacking as much as what was uncovered.

 

I've never been under the impression that they want to be friends.

I've never been under the impression that they want to be friends.

 

Neither have I.

Interesting read. Two different Russian agencies were involved. Evidence shows that they changed some docs.

 

 

All Signs Point to Russia Being Behind the DNC Hack | Motherboard

 

:lol2: Ill bet this was a DNC plant article also. Maybe they can hack them again and prove the DNC is behind this also( which is probably true). No amount of propaganda and smoke and mirrors are gonna cover this election rigging up.

So a day after the release someone has all this figured out and it was (ta-da) Russia (and Trump)?

 

Really?

 

Do the talking point (TP) people think we are that gullible? Hold off on answering that....

Does it really matter who uncovered it if it's true. That's like a swat team taking down a terrorist cell in the US and the only thing people want to talk about is who the snitch is that turned the cell in.