July 4, 201610 yr 1) Higher personal and business taxes. 2) More trade agreements exporting the economy offshore. 3) Invasion of Syria to remove Bashear, resulting in more Islamic radicalization. 4) More foreign technology labour as HRC gives Green Cards to graduates of foreign universities. 5) Explosion of drug trade and addiction epidemic as a consequence of open borders and suppression of border enforcement. 6) Accelerated nation debt. Social security insolvency. 7) More complex regulations motivating more business to leverage free trade agreements. 8) Complete loss of national cultural identity. 9) Military deterioration leaving the country vulnerable to attack. 10) Increased terrorism through infiltration of the US Muslim population.
July 4, 201610 yr Author ....and most importantly a liberal leaning Supreme Court. Thus my vote. So, you agree with the above?
July 4, 201610 yr ....and most importantly a liberal leaning Supreme Court. Thus my vote. This is the one reason above all others that I'd vote for anyone over her.
July 4, 201610 yr So, you agree with the above? Doesn't matter and I doubt it all will happen, but some may. Most would be true with any President we elect. I am not a HRC fan, however, there is no other option for me and what I believe is best. All of that is rhetoric to me and probably most. I will not and won't debate what I think is rhetoric. The Supreme Court nominations are most important to me.
July 4, 201610 yr ....and most importantly a liberal leaning Supreme Court. Thus my vote. Which is why I WILL NOT vote for her.
July 4, 201610 yr We aren't going to have personal attacks in this thread. Ain't happenin'. Maybe I am lost True but where do you even remotely see a personal attack?
July 4, 201610 yr ....and most importantly a liberal leaning Supreme Court. This is one of the reasons I hope anyone but a Dem gets elected. I feel it would be the worst thing for this country at this time. I just think it's the wrong direction.
July 5, 201610 yr Maybe I am lost True but where do you even remotely see a personal attack? If a civilized discussion can't take place about political issues without condemning each party and their beliefs then don't expect this forum to stay open much longer. It's really that simple. Every person in here is capable of having a discussion about politics without making childish and insulting remarks about each other's party. We are not Facebook.
July 5, 201610 yr If a civilized discussion can't take place about political issues without condemning each party and their beliefs then don't expect this forum to stay open much longer. It's really that simple. Every person in here is capable of having a discussion about politics without making childish and insulting remarks about each other's party. We are not Facebook. Is stating ones reasoning for voting for/not for a candidate insulting? I hardly think that is insulting.
July 5, 201610 yr I personally see a Hillary Presidency as much of the "same old, same old". I don't really see much changing either for better or worse.
July 5, 201610 yr If a civilized discussion can't take place about political issues without condemning each party and their beliefs then don't expect this forum to stay open much longer. It's really that simple. Every person in here is capable of having a discussion about politics without making childish and insulting remarks about each other's party. We are not Facebook. I understand the rules and thats why I asked a question.
July 5, 201610 yr ....and most importantly a liberal leaning Supreme Court. Thus my vote. Like others, this is one if the biggest reasons that I can't vote for her.
July 5, 201610 yr I expected the list to have something about Hillary taking all our guns. And Dogs and cats living together. :lol2: The only difference is HRC will have the Senate on her side for the honeymoon period so there will be fewer executive orders and more legislation.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.