Is stating ones reasoning for voting for/not for a candidate insulting? I hardly think that is insulting.

 

Nope but as you can see when things not focused on those reasons are seen they will be deleted and vacations will be handed out. We are not going down that road again. Period.

I understand the rules and thats why I asked a question.

 

Hopefully we can have civilized discussion without the potshots at each other's party so the forum can remain open.

Hopefully we can have civilized discussion without the potshots at each other's party so the forum can remain open.

Jesse and the Capt are correct. Criticizing the opposition party is not a violation of the terms of service.

Like others, this is one if the biggest reasons that I can't vote for her.

 

For me this is the only real issue in the race. I don't see much else changing unless there is a huge change in Congress, which I highly doubt.

Jesse and the Capt are correct. Criticizing the opposition party is not a violation of the terms of service.

 

Nope. That is not. It's all in how you criticize them that is the issue at hand so our advice to everyone is think about how you are saying something before you hit Submit.

 

Saying things like "you God fearing gun lovers are delusional" will get things shut down quickly. Be civilized.

For me this is the only real issue in the race. I don't see much else changing unless there is a huge change in Congress, which I highly doubt.

 

I can definitely agree with you on that.

Nope but as you can see when things not focused on those reasons are seen they will be deleted and vacations will be handed out. We are not going down that road again. Period.

 

I agree with that. T & B's post was directly after mine. Thought I had done something.

I agree with that. T & B's post was directly after mine. Thought I had done something.

 

No Sir! It was not aimed at you at all. :thumb:

Nope. That is not. It's all in how you criticize them that is the issue at hand so our advice to everyone is think about how you are saying something before you hit Submit.

 

Saying things like "you God fearing gun lovers are delusional" will get things shut down quickly. Be civilized.

I seriously need a "Speed Bump" between my brain and the "Submit" button!

 

Especially at night.

I agree with that. T & B's post was directly after mine. Thought I had done something.

 

Not at all. What some of you don't see are the posts that are moved to the moderating forum and then deleted. The post in question was a pot shot at another poster. I deleted it and put in the warning. Some people "get it" and some people don't.

I expected the list to have something about Hillary taking all our guns. And Dogs and cats living together. :lol2: The only difference is HRC will have the Senate on her side for the honeymoon period so there will be fewer executive orders and more legislation.

 

So we have you on record with the gun issue saying she won't try to ban/take anyone's guns away? That actually makes me feel relieved.

Edited July 5, 201610 yr by John Anthony

So we have you on record saying she won't try to ban/take anyone's guns away?

 

Nope.

 

She may try reinstate the assault weapons ban and making background checks more stringent, but confisigation...not hardly.

Nope. She may try reinstate the assault weapons ban and making background checks more stringent' date=' but confisigation...not hardly.[/quote']

 

Oh, so why are you calling out anyone who says she will ban guns in her presidency? I'm confused on this topic?

Oh, so why are you calling out anyone who says she will ban guns in her presidency? I'm confused on this topic?

 

I didn't call anybody out. I just said I expected it on the list.

I didn't call anybody out. I just said I expected it on the list.

 

You are correct it should be on the list and based on your last 2 post you seem to agree she will be going after guns in some capacity, we can bet the farm on it.