Just because one thinks Trump is a fascist of sorts doesn't make one a "liberal." I doubt that many of these protesters could give a coherent answer when questioned about the main differences between the D and R parties. What they do know is that Trump is a divisive figure, and it's good to see they're expressing their anger in a loud but mostly peaceful manner.

 

Evidently, you haven't watched the news. :lol2::lol2:

You could probably benefit from a course in logic. All were demonstrators, some were rioters. Regardless, it's refreshing to see young people fired up over the scary prospect of electing a fool as president.

 

Then they won't vote for Hillary either.

When the premise of the thread begins with a ridiculous shallow claim it pretty much has nowhere to go but down from here much like going down the rabbit hole in a game of "Why?" with a pre-schooler.

 

You might have noticed that so far the discussion you have tried to prompt hasn't anywhere near begun to receive much in the ways of a dignified response not because of its brilliant accuracy in observance, but because the thoughts are based on nonsense from the get go.

 

I doubt that anyone here even believes that you yourself believe this claim, and can see right through it as a petty attempt at sensationalism all for the sake of an argument.

 

If you're hoping with this to represent conservatives as intelligent, logical, and fair it does nothing but the opposite, and I would bet that many sound minded conservatives would hope that you'd not try speak for them.

 

Though the knee jerk reaction for many would be to think of it as ludicrous, I'm sure that some can feel rather reluctant and a bit disarmed to enter your arena and pander to juvenile reasoning. Honestly how does one answer to such nonsense, and I would surmise that those who have attempted to feel a little silly playing into your game.

 

You can look at this as an attack on you while avoiding to refute your wild claims all that you want, but it's either try to and fall into your trap of an endless and ridiculous game of merry-go-round, critique it by simply calling it out for just what it is, or patronize you with a sarcastic compliment, which initially is the avenue that I took.

 

And again you have avoided addressing the topic or refuting the claim. I realize it is hard to defend lunacy and even tougher to watch your party descend into the lunatic fringe, so I can understand why you cannot manage to do so. I'm hoping to spend my evening watching your party's torch bearers burn more flags, vandalize property and assault authority while Party leaders fiddle and deflect.

It's like this. Not condemning is condoning. There is no middle ground.

And again you have avoided addressing the topic or refuting the claim. I realize it is hard to defend lunacy and even tougher to watch your party descend into the lunatic fringe, so I can understand why you cannot manage to do so. I'm hoping to spend my evening watching your party's torch bearers burn more flags, vandalize property and assault authority while Party leaders fiddle and deflect.

 

This tells me that you completely misunderstood (or chose to) my entire response which helps to clearly demonstrate what a waste of words it is to play your game with you.

 

Simple and plain anyone with a half a brain can see that you're broad stroking with irrational and dramatically slanted claims, so much that I feel silly stating the obvious.

 

Saying any more than that, or even this much would only be encouraging you to play a game of spin, and keep applying big ol broad strokes of nonsense.

 

You should know that the more that you do, the more you lose credibility because sound minds (conservative or liberal) are not impressed, and can see right through it, and for the rubbish that it is.

 

If your goal is to sound shallow, you have succeeded, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that it wasn't.

Ok, so Rioting is now being "fired up". This is Liberal Logic. Got it.

I really like being lectured by the Ft. Thomas Pachyderm Club. If you truly want to make a difference in the upcoming election, wear your "Trump for President" straw hat and ring doorbells in Over the Rhine. It's good to see a little "street action" from young people opposed to the candidacy of Moe Howard. They'll learn to keep it legal better in coming months.

Then they won't vote for Hillary either.

Hispanic voter registration is surging in California and several other states. Hundred thousand new names in California alone, I read. Who do you think these people are going to vote for? Harold Stassen?

This tells me that you completely misunderstood (or chose to) my entire response which helps to clearly demonstrate what a waste of words it is to play your game with you.

 

Simple and plain anyone with a half a brain can see that you're broad stroking with irrational and dramatically slanted claims, so much that I feel silly stating the obvious.

 

Saying any more than that, or even this much would only be encouraging you to play a game of spin, and keep applying big ol broad strokes of nonsense.

 

You should know that the more that you do, the more you lose credibility because sound minds (conservative or liberal) are not impressed, and can see right through it, and for the rubbish that it is.

 

If your goal is to sound shallow, you have succeeded, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that it wasn't.

 

You have taken an awful lot of time to tell people that you think you are above responding to the issue being discussed.

When did you last see a group of Conservatives acting like this? This is common for Liberals, happens all the time. The constituencies the Democrats court use this M.O. all the time. The Occupy movement, BLM, Labor Unions and now these lowlife radicals. It is who the Democrats have become.

 

The uprising on the Reservation this winter out west? :idunno:

Hispanic voter registration is surging in California and several other states. Hundred thousand new names in California alone, I read. Who do you think these people are going to vote for? Harold Stassen?

 

Not Hillary if they aren't going to vote for a scary fool.

This tells me that you completely misunderstood (or chose to) my entire response which helps to clearly demonstrate what a waste of words it is to play your game with you.

 

Simple and plain anyone with a half a brain can see that you're broad stroking with irrational and dramatically slanted claims, so much that I feel silly stating the obvious.

 

Saying any more than that, or even this much would only be encouraging you to play a game of spin, and keep applying big ol broad strokes of nonsense.

 

You should know that the more that you do, the more you lose credibility because sound minds (conservative or liberal) are not impressed, and can see right through it, and for the rubbish that it is.

 

If your goal is to sound shallow, you have succeeded, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that it wasn't.

 

All of this blather to say absolutely nothing of substance on the topic. You keyboard the way Obama speaks.

The uprising on the Reservation this winter out west? :idunno:

 

To be fair, those guys had no intention of injuring anyone like the Trump protesters did and the Bundy ranch guys did not do so. What they did see was a department of the government using intimidation and heavy handed tactics to silence peaceful protesters from excercising their right to protest. While I despise the freeloader Bundy and disagreed with the view of those supporting him, I none the less support their right to peacefully protest which they tried to do at first.

Hispanic voter registration is surging in California and several other states. Hundred thousand new names in California alone, I read. Who do you think these people are going to vote for? Harold Stassen?

 

How many are legally allowed to vote?

Peace, love, equality. Liberal hypocrisy.

You could probably benefit from a course in logic. All were demonstrators, some were rioters. Regardless, it's refreshing to see young people fired up over the scary prospect of electing a fool as president.

 

Wasting your time my friend. Some can't see that there were a very large number of demonstrators where some at times were very spirited and vocal. THEN, and this is the part that they either ignore or don't understand, a small group of young people infiltrated the much larger group and stared their plan of chaos. As I said before, these were mostly young people and most likely all of them were anarchist, and I bet almost all of them won't even vote. Are they against Trump? Yes, as well as most anything else political, this is what they do. I witnessed them in Cincy in 2000 or 2001 turn a peaceful march and rally of several thousand people into chaos as about 50-60 of them infiltrated the large peaceful group. Many who were arrested were HS or collage age and were not even from this area, many were from Columbus, Indy and other places, these people organize very well and you can't argue that. But to say that they are democrats? Hardly.