March 14, 201610 yr Completely off topic but we now have Like, Dislike and a happy face button now!!! But do they work? I tried to give you a thumbs up, but nothing happened.
March 14, 201610 yr Yes I am. I would have no interest in a 1/24 matchup or first round games between seeds 16-24 What is the difference between 1vs 24 and 1 vs 16, still going to be the same team they play more than likely.
March 14, 201610 yr Yes I am. I would have no interest in a 1/24 matchup or first round games between seeds 16-24 Agreed. Highly unlikely the first couple games get much attention. Especially not enough to warrant extending the tourney like that.
March 14, 201610 yr But do they work? I tried to give you a thumbs up, but nothing happened. Yeah I've noticed that too... I'm guessing its still in the process. I was excited for about ______ this long.
March 14, 201610 yr With the tournament at 68 teams they're is only about 12 teams a season with a realistic chance at winning it all anyways. What does adding another 28 teams accomplish other than make for some really bad basketball games?
March 14, 201610 yr With the tournament at 68 teams they're is only about 12 teams a season with a realistic chance at winning it all anyways. What does adding another 28 teams accomplish other than make for some really bad basketball games? Nothing. Nobody is going to attend those games.
March 14, 201610 yr Then how do they explain IU as a 5 seed? BIG Champion of the regular season. Won the conference over Michigan State, Maryland, Purdue??? UK's 4 seed is what I expected them to get, even though the Kenpom ranking have UK as the #8 team in the country, AP as #10, Yahoo at #10 and the coaches poll has them at #13(one spot below IU). I really don't have a problem with the #4, but cannot see any scenario where Texas A & M should be higher. Someone would have to explain Indiana as a 5 seed, makes no sense at all, unless the conspiracy theorists are correct about it being the only way to match UK & IU up in the second round.:sssh:
March 14, 201610 yr UK's 4 seed is what I expected them to get, even though the Kenpom ranking have UK as the #8 team in the country, AP as #10, Yahoo at #10 and the coaches poll has them at #13(one spot below IU). I really don't have a problem with the #4, but cannot see any scenario where Texas A & M should be higher. Someone would have to explain Indiana as a 5 seed, makes no sense at all, unless the conspiracy theorists are correct about it being the only way to match UK & IU up in the second round.:sssh: The IU argument was what I was making. I have no problem with UK at 4.
March 15, 201610 yr In looking at the brackets a little more in-depth the East Bracket has 3 teams in it that either won the regular season, tournament title or both from the power 5 conferences more than any other part of the bracket the South and West each had 2 teams.
March 15, 201610 yr I'm curious about the absence of @Bench since Indiana's loss to Michigan. I would love to hear his thoughts and breakdown of a possible UK/IU matchup. I was in LA last week working. UK -5
March 15, 201610 yr I was in LA last week working. UK -5 Come on man. You can give a much better breakdown than that.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.