Jump to content

Beechwood 6 Owensboro Catholic 5 (All A Championship)


nWo

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Once again Owensboro Catholic comes up just a bit short. They have played in seveal championship games recently. All A Baseball, Basketball, and Football multiple times, but they just can't get it done. The girls softball, however, is a different story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have reported the final results in the update thread but stickymitts beat me to it because a light bulb burned out in a lamp in my livingroom and I had to call Mrs. nWo, who is on her way back from Charleston, S.C., to find out where the new bulbs were! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So did OCath intentionally walk the bases loaded for Curley? Or intentionally walk to put 2 runners on?

 

Beechwood 9th - J Baker reached on a fielding error by 2b (1-1). P Muth out

at first p to 2b, SAC, bunt (0-0); J Baker advanced to second. E Sawyer

intentionally walked. C Curley singled to center field, RBI (0-0); E Sawyer advanced

to second; J Baker scored, unearned. 1 run, 1 hit, 1 error, 2 LOB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After reading the box score I find it hard to believe O Catholic would issue an intenional walk to get to Curly in the ninth. That is not the scouting report I have read.

 

Wow. One out, runner on 2nd and they walk Sawyer intentionally to get to NKY's version of Pujols.

 

Looks like the D cost OC - only one earned run given up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beechwood 9th - J Baker reached on a fielding error by 2b (1-1). P Muth out

at first p to 2b, SAC, bunt (0-0); J Baker advanced to second. E Sawyer

intentionally walked. C Curley singled to center field, RBI (0-0); E Sawyer advanced

to second; J Baker scored, unearned. 1 run, 1 hit, 1 error, 2 LOB.

 

So there were runners on first and second after the intentional walk? That's what I'm trying to gather here. Sounds right though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there were runners on first and second after the intentional walk? That's what I'm trying to gather here. Sounds right though.

It looks like a runner reached on an error.

The next batter sacrifice bunt him to second.

The next batter received the intentional walk.

Then came the game winning hit.

 

So there were runners on first and second when the game winning hit came.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.