November 26, 201411 yr Yea but then you get clowns like this...agencies can't afford to equip officers if this is allowed to happen.... Costly public-records requests may threaten SPD plan for body cameras | Local News | The Seattle Times No chance at all he gets that.
November 26, 201411 yr Hannity just destroyed Darryl Parks (attorney for the Brown family). He didn't sound like an attorney.
November 26, 201411 yr Hahaha, none. Trust me, I'd tell you if I were. I really don't get everyone else, and maybe I'm just weird or something, but I think a guy whose just shot 70 people but is perceived safe enough to be taken alive is probably more dangerous than a kid who that a caller has referred to as having a toy gun. I was just making the point that it seems like people aren't consistent through arguments: sometimes it's fine to rely on the word of 911 callers, but sometimes it isn't, things like that. You Don't get it, it's not everyone else not getting it. You saw a clever little post and copied it here, then when everyone pointed out the absurdity of the quote you put up, you couldn't admit that you may have been looking at it wrong :lol2: If Colorado Shooter had went for a gun, raised a gun towards the police, charged them or done any thing threatening they would have shot him. You know good and well that they couldn't just shoot him if he was no longer a threat, they have to take him into custody. Edited November 26, 201411 yr by True blue (and gold)
November 26, 201411 yr No chance at all he gets that. Nor should he. If police answer a call at my house, no one else has the right to see video from my encounter with the police.
November 26, 201411 yr I don't know why you keep ignoring certain FACTS that have been repeated over and over and over. 1.) The Police didn't know he shot 70 people. He was arrested outside the theater by police who had most likely not even been inside yet. 2.) The Police didn't know anything about the caller saying it could be a toy gun. By all means, don't let facts get in the way of a point you are trying to make. We're talking apples and oranges. I know what you're saying, really, I do, but it has nothing to do with the point I was making.
November 26, 201411 yr LOL, now I see there is a photo going around saying before your wag your finger at Ferguson, and photos of such brings as a fire after Paterno was fired, a fire after UK won the title, and two other very very very small events! One couch or one flipped car on fire is not even close to Ferguson, and people who are posting it looks like fools!
November 26, 201411 yr Nor should he. If police answer a call at my house, no one else has the right to see video from my encounter with the police. Definitely. Most groups who want officers to wear cameras say that someone's right to privacy inside their own home would call for officers to quit filming. Most groups who are pro filming want to except situations like those, sexual assault investigations, contact with minors, etc.
November 26, 201411 yr Author We're talking apples and oranges. I know what you're saying, really, I do, but it has nothing to do with the point I was making. Your point does not make any sense. Why can't you see that?
November 26, 201411 yr Definitely. Most groups who want officers to wear cameras say that someone's right to privacy inside their own home would call for officers to quit filming. Most groups who are pro filming want to except situations like those, sexual assault investigations, contact with minors, etc. The system I'm most familiar with is uploaded to a 3rd party to ensure that no one locally can view it, erase, edit or release it. Can only view if you are a supervisor, detective or it is your own case.
November 26, 201411 yr Serious question. How many of these protesters actually voted a few weeks ago? I don't care who they would have voted for, but if you can't vote, how can you demand change?
November 26, 201411 yr Author Hannity just destroyed Darryl Parks (attorney for the Brown family). He didn't sound like an attorney. Agreed.
November 26, 201411 yr I sure hope these protestors don't stay up too late, they have to get up early to get to work on time.
November 26, 201411 yr I sure hope these protestors don't stay up too late, they have to get up early to get to work on time. What does that mean? Blacks don't have jobs?
November 26, 201411 yr What does that mean? Blacks don't have jobs? What do you mean? Only blacks are protesting ?
November 26, 201411 yr What does that mean? Blacks don't have jobs? I didn't mention any race. I've seen a lot of whites protesting also.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.