They did 8 months ago.

No they did not. They said it was a demonstration from some video on utube. They never said terrorist attack.

No they did not. They said it was a demonstration from some video on utube. They never said terrorist attack.

The commander in chief called it an act of terror on 9-12. Romney also was in the dark on this fact during the foreign affairs debate but Candy Crowley set him straight.

The commander in chief called it an act of terror on 9-12. Romney also was in the dark on this fact during the foreign affairs debate but Candy Crowley set him straight.

 

No he didn't and no she didn't. She later admitted she was wrong.

The commander in chief called it an act of terror on 9-12. Romney also was in the dark on this fact during the foreign affairs debate but Candy Crowley set him straight.

 

Why doesn't the Commander in Chief come out and give a press conference on the issue then, instead of sending out flunkies like Carney? Answer: so he doesn't step in more do-do.

 

Where is sexy Candy? Haven't seen her on CNN lately. A little time off?

Why doesn't the Commander in Chief come out and give a press conference on the issue then, instead of sending out flunkies like Carney? Answer: so he doesn't step in more do-do.

 

Where is sexy Candy? Haven't seen her on CNN lately. A little time off?

They only use Candy on the big stories. Not much going on these days.

The commander in chief called it an act of terror on 9-12. Romney also was in the dark on this fact during the foreign affairs debate but Candy Crowley set him straight.

 

As has been posted this is incorrect. Candy Crowley was incorrect.

 

You can watch the first 30 seconds of this clip and Obama clearly says he's not calling it a terrorist act. CBS held back this footage until the day of the election.

 

Intriguing.

 

Rep. Michele Bachmann Claims 9/11, Benghazi Were God's Judgment on U.S. for Sin (Video)

So there we have it, the republicans who are looking to blame someone, should they be blaming God? Bachmann seems to think in that direction.

The truth doesn't matter, as long as democrats go down in flames, that is all that mattters!

My guess is she is blaming the sinners, not God. Of course that would be Obama and Clinton, wouldn't it? :sssh:

The truth doesn't matter, as long as democrats go down in flames, that is all that mattters!

 

Or, the truth doesn't matter, as long as democrats are protected. Works both ways.

They only use Candy on the big stories. Not much going on these days.

 

Sunning herself on the beaches in Bali preparing for next years Sports Illustrated cover shoot.

My guess is she is blaming the sinners, not God. Of course that would be Obama and Clinton, wouldn't it? :sssh:

Michele is a very Old Testament person ... fire and brimstone.

The commander in chief called it an act of terror on 9-12. Romney also was in the dark on this fact during the foreign affairs debate but Candy Crowley set him straight.

 

On the 14th, 2 days later, Clinton, Obama, Rice told the mother of Sean Smith that the attack was driven by the video. Referring to the 12th speech, that indirectly mentions terrorism in general terms is ludicrous. The context of the speech of the clear and it is not in reference to the previous day's events.

 

Listen to the mother of one of the dead. Specifically go to the 6:00 mark. She was told noise-to-noise while being hugged by all the major players that this was due to the video.

 

Does Benghazi really matter? | Fox News Video

 

So on the 12th they said terrorism but then on the 14th told the families of the dead it was the video/protest? So they got further from the truth and not closer as the days went on? And 6 days later the were so sure of the false truth that Rice made her rounds with it?

 

McCain made it clear in October that video/protest story was completely fabricated. They had tapes - from inside the building along with UAV video from overhead from less than 2 hours into the attack.

 

The video below gets interesting at the 3:05 mark.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZ4P8V44ag4

On the 14th, 2 days later, Clinton, Obama, Rice told the mother of Sean Smith that the attack was driven by the video. Referring to the 12th speech, that indirectly mentions terrorism in general terms is ludicrous. The context of the speech of the clear and it is not in reference to the previous day's events.

 

Listen to the mother of one of the dead. Specifically go to the 6:00 mark. She was told noise-to-noise while being hugged by all the major players that this was due to the video.

 

Does Benghazi really matter? | Fox News Video

 

So on the 12th they said terrorism but then on the 14th told the families of the dead it was the video/protest? So they got further from the truth and not closer as the days went on? And 6 days later the were so sure of the false truth that Rice made her rounds with it?

 

McCain made it clear in October that video/protest story was completely fabricated. They had tapes - from inside the building along with UAV video from overhead from less than 2 hours into the attack.

 

The video below gets interesting at the 3:05 mark.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZ4P8V44ag4

 

I'm going to be blunt. A couple of posters have either ignored the hearing or don't have the intellectual capacity to understand them . We were lied to period. We still don't know how deep it runs. But at minimum we know we were lied to. If you refuse to admit the people you elected did wrong you are the problem.

I'm going to be blunt. A couple of posters have either ignored the hearing or don't have the intellectual capacity to understand them . We were lied to period. We still don't know how deep it runs. But at minimum we know we were lied to. If you refuse to admit the people you elected did wrong you are the problem.

 

 

I think the couple, few or several posters you are referring to are just choosing not to believe you guys. That would make none of us the problem and it also makes none of us part of the solution. Same old song and dance. Same old dog and pony show. Same old exercise in futility.